fREW wrote:
Does anyone know if vim uses less ram with nextaw, motif, or gtk,
assume that none of the libraries are already loaded?
-fREW
I suppose the only way to know is to compile gvim with each of the three
libraries and otherwise _exactly_ the same compile-time options. Note that
this
On 4/18/07, A.J.Mechelynck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
fREW wrote:
Does anyone know if vim uses less ram with nextaw, motif, or gtk,
assume that none of the libraries are already loaded?
-fREW
I suppose the only way to know is to compile gvim with each of the three
libraries and otherwise
fREW wrote:
On 4/18/07, A.J.Mechelynck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
fREW wrote:
Does anyone know if vim uses less ram with nextaw, motif, or gtk,
assume that none of the libraries are already loaded?
-fREW
I suppose the only way to know is to compile gvim with each of the three
libraries and
fREW wrote:
On 4/18/07, A.J.Mechelynck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
fREW wrote:
On 4/18/07, A.J.Mechelynck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
fREW wrote:
Does anyone know if vim uses less ram with nextaw, motif, or gtk,
assume that none of the libraries are already loaded?
-fREW
I suppose the
fREW wrote:
[...]
Which window manager(s) do you have installed? There may or may not be a
similar tool (showing the various running processes with their CPU and
memory
use) in the same package. If there isn't, you may try to use top, a
console
tool, but it is less precise (IIUC, it shows
On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 04:23:22 +0200
A.J.Mechelynck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
fREW wrote:
[...]
Which window manager(s) do you have installed? There may or may
not be a similar tool (showing the various running processes with
their CPU and memory
use) in the same package. If there isn't,
