On Wed, 2006-05-24 at 12:04 -0400, Charles E Campbell Jr wrote:
> A.J.Mechelynck wrote:
> > Charles E Campbell Jr wrote:
> > >
> > > I've had several folks having a problem with WinXP and netrw.
> > > The problems seem to involve temporary files during attempts to
> > > use ftp; since temporary fil
Hello,
I've been observing a regression on gvim since the release of vim 7.0.
I'm observing it on gvim 7.0.000 on windows, gvim 7.0.015 (or 17, I do
not remember) on Linux (gui=GTK2/Athena). It seems I do not have it with
the console version on Linux -- I haven't had the opportunity to test
the fo
At 06:33 AM 5/24/2006, Ulrich Lauther wrote:
As the automatic unsubscribing process does not seem to work and mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] doesn't help either, could please some kind soul
remove me from the list?
Thanks in advance
--
-lauther
--
A.J.Mechelynck wrote:
Charles E Campbell Jr wrote:
Hello, Tony!
I've had several folks having a problem with WinXP and netrw. The
problems seem to involve temporary files during attempts to use ftp;
since temporary filenames are produced by tempname(), they're o/s
dependent. Admittedly w
Benji Fisher wrote:
Did you notice this thread on vim-dev?
- Forwarded message from Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
To: vim-dev@vim.org
From: Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: vim7: &formatoptions
Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 13:48:51 +0200
I just realized that editing a directory remo
> -Original Message-
> From: Charles E Campbell Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 24 May 2006 15:55
> To: Zdenek Sekera
> Cc: vim-dev@vim.org
> Subject: Re: Pattern questions
>
> Zdenek Sekera wrote:
>
> >Sorry, I should have been clearer:
> >
> >Note the placement of the '+' in my pa
Zdenek Sekera wrote:
Sorry, I should have been clearer:
Note the placement of the '+' in my pattern, somewhere
in the middle, there it doesn't cause any problem:
if (char =~ '\m[;|<>?:[EMAIL PROTECTED]&*(){}\\_+-[\]/\"]'
^
Hi, Benji
> On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 02:22:32PM +0200, Zdenek Sekera wrote:
> > > >
> > > > if (char =~ '\m[;|<>?:[EMAIL PROTECTED]&*(){}\\_+-[\]/\"]')
> > > > do something
> > > > endif
> > > >
> > > > 2. why when the pattern ends with '+' or '\+' do I get
> > > >an error?
>
> Can you
On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 12:33:50PM +0200, Ulrich Lauther wrote:
> As the automatic unsubscribing process does not seem to work and mail to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] doesn't help either, could please some kind soul
> remove me from the list?
I think that moving the vim mailing lists to a new server
On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 12:26:35PM +0200, Mathias Michaelis wrote:
> Hi vimmers!
>
> The source archive
>
> ftp://ftp.vim.org/pub/vim/pc/vim70src.zip
>
> contains the file if_sniff.h but not the corresponding source file
> if_sniff.c. Has this a specific reason or has if_sniff.c simply been
> fo
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 02:22:32PM +0200, Zdenek Sekera wrote:
> > >
> > > if (char =~ '\m[;|<>?:[EMAIL PROTECTED]&*(){}\\_+-[\]/\"]')
> > > do something
> > > endif
> > >
> > > 2. why when the pattern ends with '+' or '\+' do I get
> > >an error?
Can you be more specific? I tried
:le
On 5/24/06, Yakov Lerner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/24/06, Eric Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think 'readonly' does not belong in the .vimrc since it is a
> buffer-local-only option.
If you try to set any other buffer-local option in .vimrc,
you'll see that it works just fine.
I tr
On 5/24/06, Zdenek Sekera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: Eric Arnold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 24 May 2006 12:38
> To: Zdenek Sekera
> Cc: vim-dev@vim.org
> Subject: Re: set readonly - strange?
>
> I think 'readonly' does not belong in the .vimrc since it
On 5/24/06, Eric Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think 'readonly' does not belong in the .vimrc since it is a
buffer-local-only option.
If you try to set any other buffer-local option in .vimrc,
you'll see that it works just fine.
I tried 'set tw=22' in file opened as 'vim -u file file' an
> -Original Message-
> From: Eric Arnold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 24 May 2006 12:38
> To: Zdenek Sekera
> Cc: vim-dev@vim.org
> Subject: Re: set readonly - strange?
>
> I think 'readonly' does not belong in the .vimrc since it is a
> buffer-local-only option.
>
Yes, but I have
I think 'readonly' does not belong in the .vimrc since it is a
buffer-local-only option.
However, you can use an autocommand to set it. What are you really
trying to do from the .vimrc ? Setting the readonly value for the
default empty starting buffer seems odd, and you can manage the
reaonly p
As the automatic unsubscribing process does not seem to work and mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] doesn't help either, could please some kind soul
remove me from the list?
Thanks in advance
--
-lauther
Ulrich Lauther
Mohsin wrote:
I am trying to use the ':py' interface to evaluate text under cursor
and show
the result in a balloon text. I got the python and vim code to work
easily,
however I have problem communicating between the two (py and vim):
1. How do I access vim variables in py commands
(like t
Hi vimmers!
The source archive
ftp://ftp.vim.org/pub/vim/pc/vim70src.zip
contains the file if_sniff.h but not the corresponding source file
if_sniff.c. Has this a specific reason or has if_sniff.c simply been
forgotten?
With kind regards
Mathias
Yakov Lerner wrote:
[...]
Note that :py commands are not available in the sandbox.
I dont know whether Balloon function is executed in the
sandbox. Maybe it is not (then :py is available in the Balloon func),
maybe it is (then :py is not available in the Balloon func). If you
find out, I'm intere
> -Original Message-
> From: Eric Arnold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 24 May 2006 11:21
> To: Zdenek Sekera
> Cc: Yakov Lerner; vim-dev@vim.org
> Subject: Re: set readonly - strange?
>
> On 5/24/06, Zdenek Sekera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From:
On 5/24/06, Zdenek Sekera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: Eric Arnold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 23 May 2006 18:12
> To: Yakov Lerner
> Cc: Zdenek Sekera; vim-dev@vim.org
> Subject: Re: set readonly - strange?
>
> As far as I can tell, there are several inst
> -Original Message-
> From: Eric Arnold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 23 May 2006 18:12
> To: Yakov Lerner
> Cc: Zdenek Sekera; vim-dev@vim.org
> Subject: Re: set readonly - strange?
>
> As far as I can tell, there are several instances where there are
> transitory buffers as vim is
23 matches
Mail list logo
