On 6/14/06, Bram Moolenaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Eric Arnold wrote:
> What should be returned by the reltime() call? If Vim script only
> handles "int" types, the values returned are apparently inconsisent.
> Am I missing something, or is reltime() on windows currently useful
> only for s
Eric Arnold wrote:
> What should be returned by the reltime() call? If Vim script only
> handles "int" types, the values returned are apparently inconsisent.
> Am I missing something, or is reltime() on windows currently useful
> only for short delta times?
reltime() returns a list to be able t
What should be returned by the reltime() call? If Vim script only
handles "int" types, the values returned are apparently inconsisent.
Am I missing something, or is reltime() on windows currently useful
only for short delta times?
I'm considering making a patch that will roll the amount of the "
Hello!
I would like to bring back a suggestion that was made in this list in
at least two occasions:
Ron Yorgason, Oct 8, 2001
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vimdev/message/25618
Bill McCarthy, Jun 27, 2005
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vimdev/message/40004
The suggestion is that the
Tony Mechelynck wrote:
> *pi_paren.txt* For Vim version 7.0. Last change: 2006 Apr 24
> line 46 (i.e. 5th from bottom)
> there is 'synmaxcolumn'
> there should be 'synmaxcol'
Thanks for the fix.
--
% cat /usr/include/sys/errno.h
#define EPERM 1 /* Operation not permit
