I am sorry, if this kind of messages are highly despised on this list.
But since vim-users are my main target group,
I created a new Firefox extension, which makes browsing the web feel
like browsing a vim buffer:
http://vimperator.mozdev.org
Maybe it helps you vim users, that :wq actually
On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 11:34 +0200, Martin Stubenschrott wrote:
I am sorry, if this kind of messages are highly despised on this list.
But since vim-users are my main target group,
I created a new Firefox extension, which makes browsing the web feel
like browsing a vim buffer:
On 4/23/07, A.J.Mechelynck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Виктор Кожухаров wrote:
Hello,
I think there might be a bug with vim7, and they way it handles the
arrow keys in a terminal.
The problem is, that in insert mode, the arrow keys don't navigate
through the text, but output letters. For
On 4/23/07, A.J.Mechelynck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Виктор Кожухаров wrote:
Hello,
I think there might be a bug with vim7, and they way it handles the
arrow keys in a terminal.
The problem is, that in insert mode, the arrow keys don't navigate
through the text, but output letters. For
On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 10:35:14PM -0400, David Howland wrote:
Dear Vim gods,
Please consider adding the following command to Vim:
:bc (for buffer close)
It acts just like :bd , except that if the buffer is in a split window,
it does not remove the window.
Thank you.
I've seen this
Viktor Kojouharov wrote:
It turned out that these mappings broke the arrow keys in the terminal:
inoremap expr Esc pumvisible()?\C-E:\Esc
inoremap expr CR pumvisible()?\C-Y:\CR
inoremap expr Down pumvisible()?\C-N:\Down
inoremap expr Up pumvisible()?\C-P:\Up
inoremap expr
В пн, 2007-04-23 в 19:56 +0200, Nikolai Weibull написа:
On 4/23/07, Charles E Campbell Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Viktor Kojouharov wrote:
It turned out that these mappings broke the arrow keys in the terminal:
inoremap expr Esc pumvisible()?\C-E:\Esc
IMHO, if one is expecting
On 4/23/07, Yakov Lerner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
wish: allow a: in the function definition line:
function foo(a:line1, a:line2)
This is currently not allowed. But it seems logical to allow it.
Why should it be? Extra typing?
Counterwish: implement better semantics for VimScript so
On 4/20/07, Bram Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/11/07, Bob Hiestand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The attached patch very simply implements the following from the todo:
7 There is no way to change directory and go back without changing the local
and/or global directory. Add
