Re: syntax highlighting addition

2007-05-07 Thread Jonathan Smith
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I know this is sortof late notice, but it would be great if this could go in 7.1 final :) The empty comment is still there. Just leave that line blank. No biggie, of course, just aesthetics. i could have sworn i fixed it. this time, though, it

Re: syntax highlighting addition

2007-04-26 Thread Jonathan Smith
sorry for the long time between replies. i've been busy on other things :) Nikolai Weibull wrote: Well, the rpm spec file-type has been with us a long time, well before we knew better. Try to give your file-type an as specific name as possible. You will not be getting the name recipe; it's

vim 7.1?

2007-04-26 Thread Jonathan Smith
With the insane number of patches collecting against 7.0, and presumably the new features accumulating in the devel tree, is anyone thinking about when a 7.1 release might be made? -smithj

Re: vim 7.1?

2007-04-26 Thread Jonathan Smith
A.J.Mechelynck wrote: - Insane? All is relative. We're only at 7.0.233 as of today. FYI, Vim 6.2 went to 532 patches, see http://ftp.vim.org/pub/vim/patches/ Release early, release often :) - What devel tree? I'll believe that a 7.1 is on the rails when I see at least an alpha. Before that,

Re: syntax highlighting addition

2007-04-19 Thread Jonathan Smith
Bram Moolenaar wrote: Jonathan Smith wrote: Conary [1] has a file format called a recipe [2] which is in many ways similar in function to a spec file or an ebuild. rPath has been maintaining a syntax highlighting file for this format, but it would be nice if vim would accept a patch to include