On 19/03/2007 17:39, David Brown wrote:
Martin Krischik wrote:
Am Montag 19 März 2007 schrieb David Brown:
A macro like this:
#define FOO ((fooy) { field: 4 })
Whenever I thougth I saw it all C comes with another suprise. What
the heck is this good for?
It is a constant structure, useful,
Martin Krischik wrote:
> Am Montag 19 März 2007 schrieb David Brown:
>> A macro like this:
>>
>> #define FOO ((fooy) { field: 4 })
>
> Whenever I thougth I saw it all C comes with another suprise. What
> the heck is this good for?
It is a constant structure, useful, in this case, as a macro to
i
Am Montag 19 März 2007 schrieb David Brown:
> A macro like this:
>
> #define FOO ((fooy) { field: 4 })
Whenever I thougth I saw it all C comes with another suprise. What the heck is
this good for?
Martin
--
Martin Krischik
mailto://[EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpqr1CVAZVlY.pgp
Description: PGP signat
David Brown wrote:
> A macro like this:
>
> #define FOO ((fooy) { field: 4 })
>
> causes vim to highlight the braces (in an angry fashion), and seems to
> cause it consider all of the remaining braces in the file to be in
> error as well.
>
> Any ideas?
Highlighting curly braces inside pare
A macro like this:
#define FOO ((fooy) { field: 4 })
causes vim to highlight the braces (in an angry fashion), and seems to
cause it consider all of the remaining braces in the file to be in
error as well.
Any ideas?
Thanks,
David Brown
