Re: Controlling @Spell/@NoSpell

2006-08-09 Thread Nikolai Weibull
On 8/10/06, A.J.Mechelynck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Nikolai Weibull wrote: [spell-checking in syntax/context.vim doesn't work] After looking at the script, well, all I can say is: I don't know. Anyone else (well-versed in syntax script writing) wants to have a look at $VIMRUNTIME/syntax/cont

Re: Controlling @Spell/@NoSpell

2006-08-09 Thread A.J.Mechelynck
Nikolai Weibull wrote: On 8/9/06, A.J.Mechelynck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Nikolai Weibull wrote: > The inclusion of syntax/ruby.vim is fine, but the inclusion of > syntax/xml.vim breaks. > > C has this: > > syn regioncString start=+L\="+ skip=+\|\\"+ end=+"+ > contains=cSpecial

Re: Controlling @Spell/@NoSpell

2006-08-09 Thread Nikolai Weibull
On 8/9/06, A.J.Mechelynck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Nikolai Weibull wrote: > The inclusion of syntax/ruby.vim is fine, but the inclusion of > syntax/xml.vim breaks. > > C has this: > > syn regioncString start=+L\="+ skip=+\|\\"+ end=+"+ > contains=cSpecial,@Spell > > which corres

Re: Controlling @Spell/@NoSpell

2006-08-09 Thread A.J.Mechelynck
Nikolai Weibull wrote: On 8/9/06, A.J.Mechelynck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Nikolai Weibull wrote: [...] > That's the conclusion I reached as well, but the thing is that the C > syntax has [EMAIL PROTECTED] as well, but doesn't cause any problems. > > nikolai > > Well, then you may have to com

Re: Controlling @Spell/@NoSpell

2006-08-09 Thread Nikolai Weibull
On 8/9/06, A.J.Mechelynck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Nikolai Weibull wrote: [...] > That's the conclusion I reached as well, but the thing is that the C > syntax has [EMAIL PROTECTED] as well, but doesn't cause any problems. > > nikolai > > Well, then you may have to compare the various syntax

Re: Controlling @Spell/@NoSpell

2006-08-09 Thread A.J.Mechelynck
Nikolai Weibull wrote: [...] That's the conclusion I reached as well, but the thing is that the C syntax has [EMAIL PROTECTED] as well, but doesn't cause any problems. nikolai Well, then you may have to compare the various syntax scripts ($VIMRUNTIME/xml.vim, $VIMRUNTIME/c.vim, possibly al

Re: Controlling @Spell/@NoSpell

2006-08-09 Thread Nikolai Weibull
On 8/9/06, A.J.Mechelynck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Nikolai Weibull wrote: > In my syntax/context.vim I include a bunch of other syntaxes. All > work fine except for the xml one, as spell-checking stops working when > it's included. It seems to be due to the fact that there are items in > the

Re: Controlling @Spell/@NoSpell

2006-08-08 Thread A.J.Mechelynck
Nikolai Weibull wrote: In my syntax/context.vim I include a bunch of other syntaxes. All work fine except for the xml one, as spell-checking stops working when it's included. It seems to be due to the fact that there are items in the xml syntax that are marked to contain @Spell. This seems to

Controlling @Spell/@NoSpell

2006-08-08 Thread Nikolai Weibull
In my syntax/context.vim I include a bunch of other syntaxes. All work fine except for the xml one, as spell-checking stops working when it's included. It seems to be due to the fact that there are items in the xml syntax that are marked to contain @Spell. This seems to set off the default of h