On Sun, 2007-03-18 at 17:32 +0100, Nikolai Weibull wrote:
> On 3/18/07, Asiri Rathnayake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 2007-03-18 at 14:07 +0100, Nikolai Weibull wrote:
>
> > > Then there's the parallel one that keeps track of all the states that
> > > we're currently in that accepts a
On 3/18/07, Asiri Rathnayake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, 2007-03-18 at 14:07 +0100, Nikolai Weibull wrote:
> Then there's the parallel one that keeps track of all the states that
> we're currently in that accepts as soon as an accepting/final state is
> reached.
I think by parallel
On Sun, 2007-03-18 at 15:07 +0100, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> Asiri Rathanayake wrote:
>
> > I read several articles on possible NFA implementations ( took some time
> > to understand ). But I think implementing an NFA based approach is quite
> > possible ( Russ Cox has provided a sample implementati
On Sun, 2007-03-18 at 14:07 +0100, Nikolai Weibull wrote:
> On 3/18/07, Asiri Rathnayake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I read several articles on possible NFA implementations ( took some time
> > to understand ). But I think implementing an NFA based approach is quite
> > possible ( Russ Cox ha
Asiri Rathanayake wrote:
> I read several articles on possible NFA implementations ( took some time
> to understand ). But I think implementing an NFA based approach is quite
> possible ( Russ Cox has provided a sample implementation in his
> article ). But I'm having a hard time understanding th
On 3/18/07, Asiri Rathnayake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I read several articles on possible NFA implementations ( took some time
to understand ). But I think implementing an NFA based approach is quite
possible ( Russ Cox has provided a sample implementation in his
article ). But I'm having a ha
