Yakov Lerner wrote:
In case you can't reproduce it, Bram, I' attaching the output
with all escape sequences. The output was taken using
vim -u /tmp/1 /tmp/1 | tee /tmp/output
It clearly shows how the three delayed 'readonly readonly readonly'
are printed *afer* vim uninitialized the
On 6/19/06, Bram Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yakov Lerner wrote:
After the following patch, the output is better. Two out of
three 'readonly' lines are now in place.
--- message.c.000 2006-06-19 02:49:34.0 +0300
+++ message.c 2006-06-19 02:52:41.0 +0300
@@
On 6/18/06, Bram Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yakov Lerner wrote:
On 5/23/06, Zdenek Sekera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
create a file ~/.vimtest as follows:
cat .vimtest
set nocompatible
set readonly
C-D
and execute (g)vim:
vim .vimtest -u .vimtest
try
Yakov Lerner wrote:
On 6/18/06, Bram Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yakov Lerner wrote:
On 5/23/06, Zdenek Sekera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
create a file ~/.vimtest as follows:
cat .vimtest
set nocompatible
set readonly
C-D
and execute (g)vim:
vim .vimtest
On 6/18/06, Yakov Lerner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/18/06, Bram Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yakov Lerner wrote:
On 5/23/06, Zdenek Sekera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
create a file ~/.vimtest as follows:
cat .vimtest
set nocompatible
set readonly
C-D
-Original Message-
From: Eric Arnold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 23 May 2006 18:12
To: Yakov Lerner
Cc: Zdenek Sekera; vim-dev@vim.org
Subject: Re: set readonly - strange?
As far as I can tell, there are several instances where there are
transitory buffers as vim is starting
On 5/24/06, Zdenek Sekera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Eric Arnold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 23 May 2006 18:12
To: Yakov Lerner
Cc: Zdenek Sekera; vim-dev@vim.org
Subject: Re: set readonly - strange?
As far as I can tell, there are several instances
-Original Message-
From: Eric Arnold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 24 May 2006 11:21
To: Zdenek Sekera
Cc: Yakov Lerner; vim-dev@vim.org
Subject: Re: set readonly - strange?
On 5/24/06, Zdenek Sekera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Eric Arnold
-Original Message-
From: Eric Arnold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 24 May 2006 12:38
To: Zdenek Sekera
Cc: vim-dev@vim.org
Subject: Re: set readonly - strange?
I think 'readonly' does not belong in the .vimrc since it is a
buffer-local-only option.
Yes, but I have only one
On 5/24/06, Eric Arnold [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think 'readonly' does not belong in the .vimrc since it is a
buffer-local-only option.
If you try to set any other buffer-local option in .vimrc,
you'll see that it works just fine.
I tried 'set tw=22' in file opened as 'vim -u file file' and
On 5/24/06, Yakov Lerner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/24/06, Eric Arnold [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think 'readonly' does not belong in the .vimrc since it is a
buffer-local-only option.
If you try to set any other buffer-local option in .vimrc,
you'll see that it works just fine.
I tried
create a file ~/.vimtest as follows:
cat .vimtest
set nocompatible
set readonly
C-D
and execute (g)vim:
vim .vimtest -u .vimtest
try :set readonly? and you'll get 'noreadonly'.
Looks strange at the minimum, bug?
---Zdenek
I wouldn't expect that to work. There is no defined loaded buffer
when the -u vimrc is run. 'readonly' is local to buffers only, so in
your example, it has no buffer to be applied to.
If you want everything to be readonly, try setting a BufEnter autocommand.
If you want just one file to be
As far as I can tell, there are several instances where there are
transitory buffers as vim is starting, opening a new tab, probably
some in closing op.s.
I don't know if I used the right word by saying the buffer is
undefined, but I don't think it it's guaranteed to be usable until a
certain
14 matches
Mail list logo
