Re: Vim version 7.1a BETA has been released

Gary Johnson wrote: On 2007-05-05, A.J.Mechelynck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Bram Moolenaar wrote: Announcing: Vim (Vi IMproved) version 7.1a BETA This is a BETA release of Vim 7.1. It consists of Vim 7.0 plus all patches and updated runtime files. I expect this to be stable, since the

Re: Vim version 7.1a BETA has been released

On 2007-05-05, Bram Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Announcing: Vim (Vi IMproved) version 7.1a BETA This is a BETA release of Vim 7.1. It consists of Vim 7.0 plus all patches and updated runtime files. I expect this to be stable, since the patches have been used by many people

Re: Vim version 7.1a BETA -- svn ?

Yakov Lerner wrote: On 2007-05-05, Bram Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Announcing: Vim (Vi IMproved) version 7.1a BETA I tried to build vim7.1 from svn. But all I get from usual svn location (https://svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/vim/vim7), is vim 7.0.236. Will vim7.1 be served at this

Re: Vim version 7.1a BETA has been released

Gary Johnson wrote: I noticed that filetype.vim does not include the patch that I submitted to this list 2006-07-25 to fix the recognition of mutt temporary files on SunOS. Is there something else I can do to have this patch accepted? It was still in the todo list. There are many items

Re: Vim version 7.1a BETA -- svn ?

Yakov Lerner wrote: On 2007-05-05, Bram Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Announcing: Vim (Vi IMproved) version 7.1a BETA I tried to build vim7.1 from svn. But all I get from usual svn location (https://svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/vim/vim7), is vim 7.0.236. Will vim7.1 be served at

Re: Patch: virtcol([123,'$'])

Michael Schaap wrote: On 26-Mar-2007 18:25, Bram Moolenaar wrote: Michael Schaap wrote: Here's a patch to make virtcol([123, '$']) do the right thing. If it looks good to you, can you include it? Looks good, I'll include it. Thanks! It appears that this didn't

Re: Vim version 7.1a BETA has been released

Gary Johnson wrote: On 2007-05-05, A.J.Mechelynck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: (Warning: In the ln command as used here, the target name comes before the link name. I find this counter-intuitive.) It's not just me then. I have to think carefully about that every time I use ln. I used to

Re: Vim version 7.1a BETA has been released

Michael Henry wrote: Gary Johnson wrote: On 2007-05-05, A.J.Mechelynck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: (Warning: In the ln command as used here, the target name comes before the link name. I find this counter-intuitive.) It's not just me then. I have to think carefully about that every time I

Re: Patch: virtcol([123,'$'])

On 6-May-2007 14:11, Bram Moolenaar wrote: Michael Schaap wrote: On 26-Mar-2007 18:25, Bram Moolenaar wrote: Michael Schaap wrote: Here's a patch to make virtcol([123, '$']) do the right thing. If it looks good to you, can you include it? Looks good, I'll include

Re: Vim version 7.1a BETA -- svn ?

Am Sonntag 06 Mai 2007 schrieb Yakov Lerner: On 2007-05-05, Bram Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Announcing: Vim (Vi IMproved) version 7.1a BETA I tried to build vim7.1 from svn. But all I get from usual svn location (https://svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/vim/vim7), is vim 7.0.236. Will

VimWiki - again - but with a brand new option

Hello Vim Developers, Hello Vim Users, some time ago there was a huge discussion about a Vim-Wiki. In the end WikiBooks has the highest support. Still some whished for a Vim-only-Wiki instead of beeing part of a larger project. For this a new option is not open: SourceForge ended the beta for

Re: Vim version 7.1a BETA -- svn ?

On 5/6/07, Martin Krischik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Am Sonntag 06 Mai 2007 schrieb Yakov Lerner: On 2007-05-05, Bram Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Announcing: Vim (Vi IMproved) version 7.1a BETA I tried to build vim7.1 from svn. But all I get from usual svn location

Re: VimWiki - again - but with a brand new option

Hi all Independent of the implementation used, I suggest to develop good guidelines. The Wiki should be really valuable and not redundant to vim-tips or mailing-lists. I think it's also important to have some people feeling responsible for it so if someone doesn't follow the rules, they will

Re: Vim version 7.1a BETA -- svn ?

Am Sonntag 06 Mai 2007 schrieb Yakov Lerner: On 5/6/07, Martin Krischik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Am Sonntag 06 Mai 2007 schrieb Yakov Lerner: On 2007-05-05, Bram Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Announcing: Vim (Vi IMproved) version 7.1a BETA I tried to build vim7.1 from svn.

Re: Vim version 7.1a BETA -- svn ?

[Martin Krischik] [Martin Krischik] That is probalby because the svn server is a mess. [probably] Only the vim svn archive has no space for tags, braches or releases. [branches] It is not a mess, merely being different. If

patch 7.1a.001

Patch 7.1a.001 Problem:Crash when downloading a spell file. (Szabolcs Horvat) Solution: Avoid that did_set_spelllang() is used recursively when a new window is opened for the download. Also avoid wiping out the wrong buffer. Files:

Where to find 7.1a patchlevels runtimes? (Was: patch 7.1a.001)

Bram Moolenaar wrote: Patch 7.1a.001 Problem:Crash when downloading a spell file. (Szabolcs Horvat) Solution: Avoid that did_set_spelllang() is used recursively when a new window is opened for the download. Also avoid wiping out the wrong buffer. Files:

Re: Vim version 7.1a BETA -- svn ?

François Pinard wrote: [Martin Krischik] [Martin Krischik] That is probalby because the svn server is a mess. [probably] Only the vim svn archive has no space for tags, braches or releases. [branches] It is not a mess, merely

Re: patch 7.1a.001

Sent this direct to Bram by accident instead of to the dev list... Hey All, Patch 7.1a.001 I managed to compile 7.1a from cvs yesterday. I went and did a cvs up to grab this patch and I am now getting this error: gui_w32.c:236: error: redefinition of `struct tagNMTTDISPINFOA'

Re: Vim version 7.1a BETA -- svn ?

On 5/7/07, François Pinard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [Martin Krischik] [Martin Krischik] That is probalby because the svn server is a mess. [probably] Only the vim svn archive has no space for tags, braches or releases. [branches]

Re: Vim version 7.1a BETA -- svn ?

On 5/7/07, A.J.Mechelynck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: François Pinard wrote: [Martin Krischik] [Martin Krischik] That is probalby because the svn server is a mess. [probably] Only the vim svn archive has no space for tags, braches or releases.

Re: Vim version 7.1a BETA -- svn ?

On 5/6/07, Yakov Lerner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 5/6/07, Martin Krischik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Am Sonntag 06 Mai 2007 schrieb Yakov Lerner: On 2007-05-05, Bram Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Announcing: Vim (Vi IMproved) version 7.1a BETA I tried to build vim7.1 from svn.

[PATCH] minor doc patch

Hi Bram, Find attached a patch that properly brackets the use of Enter in the docs. cheers vimdoc-enter-brackets.patch Description: vimdoc-enter-brackets.patch

problem with win32 vim 7.1a.001

Hello vim list, I've just synced up to 7.1a.001 (svn #263) and built on Win32 (MSVC). Everything builds fine and I replace my previous gvim.exe and vim.exe with the newly built versions. I also sync my runtime from ftp.nluug.nl. My vim installation is in: C:\Vim\vim70 My config is in: