Re: [Fwd: Re: compiling vim7.1 (huge version) gets build with normal version]

2007-05-17 Thread Stephan Hegel
Hi, A.J.Mechelynck wrote: - Using cat is OK as long as you can be sure that you'll get them in numeric order: this is usually the case on Unix but not necessarily on Dos, where a wildcarded filename usually gets its results in directory order, not sorted by filename. Well, you are right: I'm

Re: [Fwd: Re: compiling vim7.1 (huge version) gets build with normal version]

2007-05-17 Thread A.J.Mechelynck
Stephan Hegel wrote: Hi, A.J.Mechelynck wrote: - Using cat is OK as long as you can be sure that you'll get them in numeric order: this is usually the case on Unix but not necessarily on Dos, where a wildcarded filename usually gets its results in directory order, not sorted by filename.

Re: Subject: Re: vim on cygwin using win32 clipboard

2007-05-17 Thread Gary Johnson
On 2007-02-15, Frodak Baksik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 2/15/07, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: Also, is there anything I can do to help get the original patch accepted? Ask a few people to try it out and report their results here. I'll give it a shot. Is there somewhere I can grab

Re: [Fwd: Re: compiling vim7.1 (huge version) gets build with normal version]

2007-05-17 Thread Michael Henry
A.J.Mechelynck wrote: - What is ncftp? On my openSUSE 10.2 system I have a program called ftp but none called ncftp. ncftp (pronounced Nik-F-T-P) is an alternative command-line FTP client. Slackware ships it[1] (or so the link leads me to believe). You can read more at the ncftp[2] web

Re: MSVC build option about default library MSVCRT

2007-05-17 Thread Yongwei Wu
Hi Doug, On 17/05/07, Doug Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Bram is wise. No objection here ;-). Adding a nodefaultlib:msvcrt could potentially break things if you set USE_MSVCRT=1 to use the CRT DLL instead of statically linking the CRT. The problem is that you're linking a static-CRT version

Re: [Fwd: Re: compiling vim7.1 (huge version) gets build with normal version]

2007-05-17 Thread Stephan Hegel
A.J.Mechelynck wrote: - What is ncftp? On my openSUSE 10.2 system I have a program called ftp but none called ncftp. [39]./home/steve: rpm -qi ncftp Name: ncftpRelocations: (not relocatable) Version : 3.1.9 Vendor: SUSE LINUX

Re: [Fwd: Re: compiling vim7.1 (huge version) gets build with normal version]

2007-05-17 Thread A.J.Mechelynck
Stephan Hegel wrote: A.J.Mechelynck wrote: - What is ncftp? On my openSUSE 10.2 system I have a program called ftp but none called ncftp. [39]./home/steve: rpm -qi ncftp Name: ncftpRelocations: (not relocatable) Version : 3.1.9

RE: MSVC build option about default library MSVCRT

2007-05-17 Thread Doug Cook
If the lib is added explicitly, you're right -- it probably won't break anything. However, there are actually three CRTs. libc (single-threaded static), libcmt (multi-threaded static), and msvcrt (multi-threaded DLL). libc is no longer supported (there is no longer any such thing as a

Re: MSVC build option about default library MSVCRT

2007-05-17 Thread Yongwei Wu
Hi Doug, On 18/05/07, Doug Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If the lib is added explicitly, you're right -- it probably won't break anything. However, there are actually three CRTs. libc (single-threaded static), libcmt (multi-threaded static), and msvcrt (multi-threaded DLL). libc is no longer

[OT] MSVCRT and MSVCR71 (Was: Re: MSVC build option about default library MSVCRT)

2007-05-17 Thread Yongwei Wu
On 18/05/07, Doug Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There's nothing wrong with msvcr71.dll or msvcr80.dll. In fact, they have many bug fixes and performance improvements over msvcrt.dll. Thinking more carefully on this, I tend to disagree. Only the interfaces in msvcrt.dll is more or less fixed,

Re: [Fwd: Re: compiling vim7.1 (huge version) gets build with normal version]

2007-05-17 Thread scott
On Thursday 17 May 2007 13:32, A.J.Mechelynck wrote: A.J.Mechelynck wrote: - What is ncftp? On my openSUSE 10.2 system I have a program called ftp but none called ncftp. Well, AFAICT it has disappeared between SuSE 10.0 and 10.2. I have packages named lftp and lukemftp (which are

Cannot print in UTF-8?

2007-05-17 Thread A.J.Mechelynck
:set enc? penc? encoding=utf-8 printencoding=utf-8 :%ha not found in runtimepath: print/utf-8.ps Is this last message normal? I have here a file including an Esperanto-French glossary, which contains both the consonants+circumflex of Esperanto and the French oe ligature. No matter how I

Re: [Fwd: Re: compiling vim7.1 (huge version) gets build with normal version]

2007-05-17 Thread A.J.Mechelynck
scott wrote: [...] ncftp should have popped right up for you -- what do you have in Configured Software Catalogs (under installation sources)? sc Status Refresh Name URL On On YaST iso:///?iso=openSUSE-10.2-GM-DVD-i386.isourl=hd:///?device=/dev/hda2filesystem=auto On On

RE: MSVC build option about default library MSVCRT

2007-05-17 Thread Doug Cook
There is no such thing as a single-threaded Windows app. The programmer might only start one thread, but other system components might start other threads in the process, so the CRT needs to be aware of threads whether or not the programmer does any threading. That's why Microsoft stopped creating

Re: [Fwd: Re: compiling vim7.1 (huge version) gets build with normal version]

2007-05-17 Thread Stephan Hegel
A.J.Mechelynck wrote: Well, AFAICT it has disappeared between SuSE 10.0 and 10.2. No, my copy of Suse 10.2 contains the package: [18]/media/dvdram/suse/i586: rpm -qip ncftp-3.2.0-17.i586.rpm Name: ncftp Relocations: (not relocatable) Version : 3.2.0

Re: [Fwd: Re: compiling vim7.1 (huge version) gets build with normal version]

2007-05-17 Thread Stephan Hegel
scott wrote: a visit to yast, software management, searched for ncftp and it brought ncftp right to the fore, installed it for me, and i've been happily learning features since -- imagine commandline recall that works in ftp! bookmarks! And I just figured out that it comes with an utility