Neil Bird wrote:
> Around about 19/04/06 20:03, Bram Moolenaar typed ...
> > Main issue is: Do you open another buffer or window?
>
>I don't believe so. Apart from some tricky indirection (the srcctl
> plugin has a generic set up, then calls the relevant real script
> functions depending up
Around about 21/04/06 09:16, Neil Bird typed ...
I guess the basic sequence is:
- you do "z=" and select a suggestion, this is to be inserted
- your file is RO, thus the FileChangedRO autocmd is triggered
- your FileChangedRO autocmd uses sourcesafe to get the file
Hmm, does thi
Around about 19/04/06 20:03, Bram Moolenaar typed ...
Main issue is: Do you open another buffer or window?
I don't believe so. Apart from some tricky indirection (the srcctl plugin
has a generic set up, then calls the relevant real script functions depending
upon the SCM S/W being used, So
Around about 19/04/06 13:38, Giuseppe Bilotta typed ...
Can Vim be run with Valgrind?
Tried that; couldn't see the wood for the trees :-(
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# rm -f .signature
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# ls -l .signature
ls: .signature: No such file or directory
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# exit
Neil Bird wrote:
> Around about 19/04/06 12:07, Bram Moolenaar typed ...
> > Apparently your FileChangedRO autocommand does something nasty. I
> > suspect we need to detect that nastyness and disallow it. Any idea what
> > the nasty bit could be?
>
>I tried making a cut down fake version,
On Wed, 19 Apr 2006 13:07:12 +0200, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> After some pointers go wrong anything can happen, thus how it crashes
> exactly is not interesting. It could help to use a library that forbids
> access to freed memory, like efence. Then the error is detected much
> earlier and a stack
Around about 19/04/06 12:07, Bram Moolenaar typed ...
Apparently your FileChangedRO autocommand does something nasty. I
suspect we need to detect that nastyness and disallow it. Any idea what
the nasty bit could be?
I tried making a cut down fake version, but that always worked. It's
esse
Neil Bird wrote:
> Around about 07/04/06 13:56, Bram Moolenaar typed ...
> >>> The check for the current buffer to be locked was a bit too generic.
> >>> I'll explicitly allow using ":edit" without an argument.
> >>What about :checktime ? Says it's postponed till after the autocmd, so
> >>
Around about 19/04/06 09:38, Neil Bird typed ...
If I come up with any more info., I'll let you know.
OK, spoke too soon, I seem to be able to subtly change the behaviour by
which spell option I select. I'd always been selecting '1', the first, to get
the crashes before; selecting other
Around about 07/04/06 13:56, Bram Moolenaar typed ...
The check for the current buffer to be locked was a bit too generic.
I'll explicitly allow using ":edit" without an argument.
What about :checktime ? Says it's postponed till after the autocmd, so
should it be OK too?
Hmm, it seems so.
10 matches
Mail list logo