On Tuesday 08 May 2007 21:29, you wrote:
On 5/8/07, scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i was surpised by the fact that simply running 'svn update' bumped me up
to 7.1a -- from previous posts i had thought there was something extra
that had to be done to get the beta, like create a new 71a
Edward L. Fox wrote:
On 5/8/07, scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i was surpised by the fact that simply running 'svn update' bumped me
up to
7.1a -- from previous posts i had thought there was something extra
that had
to be done to get the beta, like create a new 71a directory or something
now
On Tuesday 08 May 2007 12:04, you wrote:
Edward L. Fox wrote:
On 5/8/07, scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i was surpised by the fact that simply running 'svn update' bumped me
up to
7.1a -- from previous posts i had thought there was something extra
that had
to be done to get the beta,
Mr Toothpik wrote:
i was surpised by the fact that simply running 'svn update' bumped me
up to 7.1a -- from previous posts i had thought there was something
extra that had to be done to get the beta, like create a new 71a
directory or something
now i've got the beta i feel committed, and
Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Mr Toothpik wrote:
i was surpised by the fact that simply running 'svn update' bumped me
up to 7.1a -- from previous posts i had thought there was something
extra that had to be done to get the beta, like create a new 71a
directory or something
now i've got the beta i
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 04:50:36PM -0500, Robert Lee wrote:
The SVN Repos has conflict markers left in the file filetype.vim,
Sorry for the silly question, but the answer is not clear to me from
your text: is your working copy that has conflict markers or the last
committed version in the
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 04:50:36PM -0500, Robert Lee wrote:
The SVN Repos has conflict markers left in the file filetype.vim,
Sorry for the silly question, but the answer is not clear to me from
your text: is your working copy that has conflict markers or the
On Tuesday 08 May 2007 15:32, you wrote:
Mr Toothpik wrote:
i was surpised by the fact that simply running 'svn update' bumped me
up to 7.1a -- from previous posts i had thought there was something
extra that had to be done to get the beta, like create a new 71a
directory or something
On 5/8/07, scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i was surpised by the fact that simply running 'svn update' bumped me up to
7.1a -- from previous posts i had thought there was something extra that had
to be done to get the beta, like create a new 71a directory or something
now i've got the beta i
i was surpised by the fact that simply running 'svn update' bumped me up to
7.1a -- from previous posts i had thought there was something extra that had
to be done to get the beta, like create a new 71a directory or something
now i've got the beta i feel committed, and will commence chasing
On 5/8/07, scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i was surpised by the fact that simply running 'svn update' bumped me up to
7.1a -- from previous posts i had thought there was something extra that had
to be done to get the beta, like create a new 71a directory or something
now i've got the beta i
11 matches
Mail list logo
