Re: todo? (setting eol/noeol after :r !cmd ? )

2007-02-28 Thread Bram Moolenaar
Yakov Lerner wrote: > Maybe vim would better set &eol/&noel after ':r !cmd' also, > no only after reading the file into buffer ? (that is, the condition > whether input had final \n or not). > As I can see currently, this piece of info is lost after ': !cmd' ? It completely depends on what you a

Re: todo? (setting eol/noeol after :r !cmd ? )

2007-02-28 Thread A.J.Mechelynck
Yakov Lerner wrote: Hello Bram, Maybe vim would better set &eol/&noel after ':r !cmd' also, no only after reading the file into buffer ? (that is, the condition whether input had final \n or not). As I can see currently, this piece of info is lost after ': !cmd' ? Yakov Maybe after :$r !cmd

todo? (setting eol/noeol after :r !cmd ? )

2007-02-28 Thread Yakov Lerner
Hello Bram, Maybe vim would better set &eol/&noel after ':r !cmd' also, no only after reading the file into buffer ? (that is, the condition whether input had final \n or not). As I can see currently, this piece of info is lost after ': !cmd' ? Yakov