Re: improving encryption in vim

2007-03-19 Thread Matthew Winn
On Sun, 18 Mar 2007 15:57:33 -0600, Josh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The main problem that I see is that adding a strong encryption function can have regulation issues. That was the only reason that I thought about using the external library is to get around this. With an algorithm like Rijndael

Understanding regxp implementation

2007-03-19 Thread Asiri Rathnayake
Hi Bram, Nicolai, I'm unable to grasp the description ( attachment ) given in the regxp.c file. For a moment they seem like NFA fragments for operators |,+,* and so on, but then again I'm in doubt ( specially i don't understand what a node in this context is ). A little help is greatly

Re: Understanding regxp implementation

2007-03-19 Thread Asiri Rathnayake
On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 11:55 +0100, Nikolai Weibull wrote: On 3/19/07, Asiri Rathnayake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Bram, Nicolai, A 'k' would be greatly appreciated. I'm really really sorry, won't happen again... I'm unable to grasp the description ( attachment ) given in the regxp.c

Re: Understanding regxp implementation

2007-03-19 Thread Nikolai Weibull
On 1/1/07, Asiri Rathnayake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 11:55 +0100, Nikolai Weibull wrote: On 3/19/07, Asiri Rathnayake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Bram, Nicolai, A 'k' would be greatly appreciated. I'm really really sorry, won't happen again... Hehe, don't take it

C syntax problem with C99 initializers.

2007-03-19 Thread David Brown
A macro like this: #define FOO ((fooy) { field: 4 }) causes vim to highlight the braces (in an angry fashion), and seems to cause it consider all of the remaining braces in the file to be in error as well. Any ideas? Thanks, David Brown

Re: Understanding regxp implementation

2007-03-19 Thread Martin Stubenschrott
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 01:49:53PM +0100, Nikolai Weibull wrote: On 1/1/07, Asiri Rathnayake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 11:55 +0100, Nikolai Weibull wrote: On 3/19/07, Asiri Rathnayake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Bram, Nicolai, A 'k' would be greatly appreciated.

Re: C syntax problem with C99 initializers.

2007-03-19 Thread Bram Moolenaar
David Brown wrote: A macro like this: #define FOO ((fooy) { field: 4 }) causes vim to highlight the braces (in an angry fashion), and seems to cause it consider all of the remaining braces in the file to be in error as well. Any ideas? Highlighting curly braces inside parenthesis

Re: C syntax problem with C99 initializers.

2007-03-19 Thread Martin Krischik
Am Montag 19 März 2007 schrieb David Brown: A macro like this: #define FOO ((fooy) { field: 4 }) Whenever I thougth I saw it all C comes with another suprise. What the heck is this good for? Martin -- Martin Krischik mailto://[EMAIL PROTECTED] pgpqr1CVAZVlY.pgp Description: PGP

Re: C syntax problem with C99 initializers.

2007-03-19 Thread David Brown
Martin Krischik wrote: Am Montag 19 März 2007 schrieb David Brown: A macro like this: #define FOO ((fooy) { field: 4 }) Whenever I thougth I saw it all C comes with another suprise. What the heck is this good for? It is a constant structure, useful, in this case, as a macro to indicate a

Re: C syntax problem with C99 initializers.

2007-03-19 Thread Mike Williams
On 19/03/2007 17:39, David Brown wrote: Martin Krischik wrote: Am Montag 19 März 2007 schrieb David Brown: A macro like this: #define FOO ((fooy) { field: 4 }) Whenever I thougth I saw it all C comes with another suprise. What the heck is this good for? It is a constant structure,