On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 09:22:08 -0600, Josh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are no patent issues, but there is export issues, I live in the US
The reason I suggested Rijndael is because there are no US export
issues. Not only was it developed in Flanders so implementations
outside the US abound,
Reproducible: Always
Steps to reproduce:
1. Place an uppercase mark A in file aa.c;
2. use :echo line('A), it will display the correct line number;
3. change to another file, execute :echo line('A), it will display the line
number too.
Actual result:
See above.
Expected result:
In a file
Hi Bram,Nikolai,
I went through the regxp code and have a few questions...
First, Why use this kind of a coding scheme and encode patterns rather
than using a state diagram ? ( Performance/Memory ? ). Secondly, is it a
requirement that the new implementation has to follow the same method ?
I
Stuart Powers wrote:
I opend a file in vim:
vim WineComplianceVarietal.txt
then I typed:
:vs /DI_Pernod/data/pernod/product.txt
which successfully split the window.
then I typed:
:vs ./
upon which I saw: www.stuism.com/temp/vim_split_bug.png
Easwy Yang wrote:
Reproducible: Always
Steps to reproduce:
1. Place an uppercase mark A in file aa.c;
2. use :echo line('A), it will display the correct line number;
3. change to another file, execute :echo line('A), it will display the line
number too.
Actual result:
See above.
Matthew Winn wrote:
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 09:22:08 -0600, Josh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are no patent issues, but there is export issues, I live in the US
The reason I suggested Rijndael is because there are no US export
issues. Not only was it developed in Flanders so
On Sun, Mar 18, 2007 at 08:55:33PM +0100, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Main issue is that the current encryption is breakable. We need a
stronger encryption, which is free to distribute. We only need one new
method.
If a strong encryption algorithm is used, the keys may still be the weak
spot. A
Hi,
To clarify, based on my understanding: if software is exported
from the
U.S., which vim arguably is, and it is capable of powerful encryption
isn't vim exported from the Netherlands?
Nico
Sorry for sending to Bram's private mail address.
Here's my original mail.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Easwy Yang [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007-3-21 上午9:19
Subject: Re: BUG? line('A) always returns line number in all the files
To: Bram Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes, it is!
Ken Hirsch wrote:
[...]
To clarify, based on my understanding: if software is exported from the
U.S., which vim arguably is, and it is capable of powerful encryption
(64-bit symmetric keys, other limits for public-key/elliptic
algorithms), then it _is_ subject to export restrictions. As the
10 matches
Mail list logo
