Re: improving encryption in vim

2007-03-21 Thread Bram Moolenaar
Nicolas Weber wrote: To clarify, based on my understanding: if software is exported from the U.S., which vim arguably is, and it is capable of powerful encryption isn't vim exported from the Netherlands? Right, the main ftp server is in the Netherlands. All the rest are (cached)

Re: improving encryption in vim

2007-03-20 Thread Matthew Winn
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 09:22:08 -0600, Josh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There are no patent issues, but there is export issues, I live in the US The reason I suggested Rijndael is because there are no US export issues. Not only was it developed in Flanders so implementations outside the US abound,

Re: improving encryption in vim

2007-03-20 Thread Ken Hirsch
Matthew Winn wrote: On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 09:22:08 -0600, Josh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There are no patent issues, but there is export issues, I live in the US The reason I suggested Rijndael is because there are no US export issues. Not only was it developed in Flanders so

Re: improving encryption in vim

2007-03-20 Thread Andreas Gunnarsson
On Sun, Mar 18, 2007 at 08:55:33PM +0100, Bram Moolenaar wrote: Main issue is that the current encryption is breakable. We need a stronger encryption, which is free to distribute. We only need one new method. If a strong encryption algorithm is used, the keys may still be the weak spot. A

Re: improving encryption in vim

2007-03-20 Thread Nicolas Weber
Hi, To clarify, based on my understanding: if software is exported from the U.S., which vim arguably is, and it is capable of powerful encryption isn't vim exported from the Netherlands? Nico

Re: improving encryption in vim

2007-03-20 Thread A.J.Mechelynck
Ken Hirsch wrote: [...] To clarify, based on my understanding: if software is exported from the U.S., which vim arguably is, and it is capable of powerful encryption (64-bit symmetric keys, other limits for public-key/elliptic algorithms), then it _is_ subject to export restrictions. As the

Re: improving encryption in vim

2007-03-19 Thread Matthew Winn
On Sun, 18 Mar 2007 15:57:33 -0600, Josh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The main problem that I see is that adding a strong encryption function can have regulation issues. That was the only reason that I thought about using the external library is to get around this. With an algorithm like Rijndael

Re: improving encryption in vim

2007-03-18 Thread Bram Moolenaar
Josh wrote: Another idea that I saw on the list was improving the encryption in vim and encrypting the swap file. The ideas that I have for this range from replacing the encryption function in vim with one that is more secure to adding support for an external library library to adding