2011/2/16 Ted Pavlic :
>> And, of course, main.tex.latexmain is a blank file. Seeing as it works
>
> main.tex.latexmain is fine, but you can also use simply "main.latexmain"
> without the tex. That might look a little nicer (?). (I also recommend using
> \include for chapters so you can \includeonl
Hi,
First thanks a lot for your vim-latex plugins.
I had got a strange behavior. My OS is an linux ubuntu. In my home
directory I have a directory named "dev" where I put current jobs which
are not achieved. If I write latex file inside the "dev" directory the
compilation abort without any error
> Just to comment on this, when using main.latexmain compilation works
> but auto-completion by does not. main.tex.latexmain works fine
> for both compilation and auto-completion.
>
> I'm pretty sure this is a (minor) bug, should I report it?
I don't think that's necessary. It doesn't seem like a
On Mon, 2011-02-21 at 11:12 -0500, Ted Pavlic wrote:
> > Just to comment on this, when using main.latexmain compilation works
> > but auto-completion by does not. main.tex.latexmain works fine
> > for both compilation and auto-completion.
> >
> > I'm pretty sure this is a (minor) bug, should I rep
> Okay, the only reason I brought it up is that you recommended
> main.latexmain =). Was quite surprised to see that it broke completion,
> would think its quite unusable in that case (how do you use latex
> without citing, after all).
F9 is too far away from the home row. It's much faster to avoi
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Germain Vallverdu
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> First thanks a lot for your vim-latex plugins.
>
> I had got a strange behavior. My OS is an linux ubuntu. In my home
> directory I have a directory named "dev" where I put current jobs which
> are not achieved. If I write latex
> Additionally \citep, \citet, \citeauthor, etc... Not sure if they would
> match whatever pattern triggers the F9 completion... But I never use
> \cite (in favor of the natbib variaties) and almost never use \ref (in
> favor of hyperref's \autoref), and so F9 is potentially unhelpful.
Moreover, d
Hi all,
I always sort of just took the auxiliary files for granted, but now I
like the idea of avoiding the clutter.
I compile all of my documents using latex -> dvips -> ps2pdf. Now I
adjusted my g:Tex_CompileRule_pdf so that it stores all the auxiliary
files in the .build/ subdirectory. It ju
Mike --
> I always sort of just took the auxiliary files for granted, but now I
> like the idea of avoiding the clutter.
That's valuable clutter though. There are BBL files in there to
inspect/change; there are AUX files for other tools to use; etc. Not
only that, having the AUX availab
Hi Ted,
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Ted Pavlic wrote:
> Mike --
>
>> I always sort of just took the auxiliary files for granted, but now I
>> like the idea of avoiding the clutter.
>
> That's valuable clutter though. There are BBL files in there to
> inspect/change; there are AUX fil
>> That's valuable clutter though. There are BBL files in there to
>> inspect/change; there are AUX files for other tools to use; etc. Not
>> only that, having the AUX available allows for quicker edits later.
>> Imagine you have a large book that takes a few seconds each pass... If
>> you
Hi,
I use the F9-completion very often and feel to make some advertising ;)
I patched the outline.py, such that it offers a greater gain for me. But
first I will take up Ted's arguments.
> > Additionally \citep, \citet, \citeauthor, etc... Not sure if they
would
> > match whatever pattern trigg
12 matches
Mail list logo
