Hari Krishna Dara wrote:
I have hit this thrice already, while using the ?: ternary operator, in
some conditions, you are forced to put whitespace to separate the
operator otherwise Vim gets confused. Here is something that fails:
let direction = (a:0?a:1:1)
I had this issue before
On Fri, 8 Sep 2006 at 6:08am, A.J.Mechelynck wrote:
Hari Krishna Dara wrote:
[...]
I know that this is possible, but as I said previously, it is a force of
habit to compact as much as possible in some situations, though I
normally prefer using whitespace and parenthesis to improve
this unambiguously? The usage could be even worse, something like:
let direction = (a:01?a:2:a:1)
Personally, I never leave these sorts of matters to the whims of
the parser designer (no offense, Bram :) and always specify
just as I would with something as ambiguous as
a and b
Hari Krishna Dara wrote:
I have hit this thrice already, while using the ?: ternary operator, in
some conditions, you are forced to put whitespace to separate the
operator otherwise Vim gets confused. Here is something that fails:
let direction = (a:0?a:1:1)
I had this issue before calling
On Fri, 8 Sep 2006 at 4:41am, A.J.Mechelynck wrote:
Hari Krishna Dara wrote:
I have hit this thrice already, while using the ?: ternary operator, in
some conditions, you are forced to put whitespace to separate the
operator otherwise Vim gets confused. Here is something that fails:
Hari Krishna Dara wrote:
[...]
I know that this is possible, but as I said previously, it is a force of
habit to compact as much as possible in some situations, though I
normally prefer using whitespace and parenthesis to improve clarity.
Also, the reason I mentioned using spaces is not really
