Patch to fix access to freed memory in spelling checker feature

2008-02-03 Fir de Conversatie Dominique Pelle
Hi Valgrind memory checker detects that Vim is using freed memory in the spelling checker code: ==8692== Invalid read of size 1 ==8692==at 0x8199D87: spell_to_word_end (spell.c:15854) ==8692==by 0x8166424: win_line (screen.c:3054) ==8692==by 0x8163AD5: win_update (screen.c:1765)

Bug with setglobal

2008-02-03 Fir de Conversatie Ben Schmidt
Hi, Bram, Another one for the todo list, I think (can't spot it on there). If you issue setglobal in a read-only buffer for an option that locally would change the buffer, it fails with an error. E.g. in a help window issue :setglobal fenc=anything and you get E21: Cannot make changes,

Re: syntax: reusing nested expressions

2008-02-03 Fir de Conversatie George V. Reilly
let + execute. That makes a lot of sense. Thanks /G On 03/02/2008, Szabolcs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Feb 3, 7:04 am, George V. Reilly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm trying to write some syntax highlighting for PBwiki, and I'd like to reuse some complex regexps. Hi, I asked the

Re: Bug with setglobal

2008-02-03 Fir de Conversatie Tony Mechelynck
Ben Schmidt wrote: Hi, Bram, Another one for the todo list, I think (can't spot it on there). If you issue setglobal in a read-only buffer for an option that locally would change the buffer, it fails with an error. E.g. in a help window issue :setglobal fenc=anything and you get

Re: Bug with setglobal

2008-02-03 Fir de Conversatie Ben Schmidt
I confirm that it fails if 'modifiable' is off, as in a helpfile. For a plain 'readonly' (but 'modifiable') file there is no problem, and the buffer is not marked as modified. Thanks again for the correction, Tony. Not my week evidently! Ben. Send instant messages to your online

Re: Bug with setglobal

2008-02-03 Fir de Conversatie Tony Mechelynck
Ben Schmidt wrote: I confirm that it fails if 'modifiable' is off, as in a helpfile. For a plain 'readonly' (but 'modifiable') file there is no problem, and the buffer is not marked as modified. Thanks again for the correction, Tony. Not my week evidently! Ben. If ever I make

collaborative editing clarification Was: New features to vote on and sponsoring

2008-02-03 Fir de Conversatie Yakov Lerner
Hello Bram, You wrote: add collaborative editing: changes made to a buffer show up in another Vim in a second I'd like to ask for some clarifications. Clarification about perceived behaviour, not about implementation: 1. two-way collaboration or one-way collaboration ? Vim instance B attaches