On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 10:25 PM, Bram Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jan Minar wrote:
Thanks. I'll have a good look at it later. One thing I noticed: you
don't need to give an error message for running out of memory at this
level, it's already done at a lower level in alloc().
was not checked, so I fixed that as well. The updated patch (version
2) is attached.
It is now.
Cheers,
Jan.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message from the vim_dev maillist.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
John Becket wrote:
Tony Mechelynck wrote:
Maybe you should set a config-time option (or create one) to
avoid any interaction with the shell?
Even better: If you don't want ever to become the victim of
any exploit, turn your computer off at the wall switch and
leave it off.
:-b
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 3:32 AM, Matt Wozniski wrote:
Not sure what's going on here, but I've found a crash that's easy to
reproduce. First, open two X11 enabled vim (not gvim) processes. In
the first, do:
:let @+ = repeat('a', 1024*1024)
in order to store 1MB of data to the clipboard.
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 8:59 AM, Bram Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John Becket wrote:
Tony Mechelynck wrote:
Maybe you should set a config-time option (or create one) to
avoid any interaction with the shell?
Even better: If you don't want ever to become the victim of
any
Charles E. Campbell, Jr., 19.08.2008:
Tony Mechelynck wrote:
On 18/08/08 22:15, Charles Campbell wrote:
I've issued a new plugin on my website:
http://mysite.verizon.net/astronaut/vim/index.html#RLTVNMBR . It uses
the signs capability of huge vim to give relative numbering.
On Saturday 23 August 2008 07:24, Markus Heidelberg wrote:
Charles E. Campbell, Jr., 19.08.2008:
Tony Mechelynck wrote:
On 18/08/08 22:15, Charles Campbell wrote:
I've issued a new plugin on my website:
http://mysite.verizon.net/astronaut/vim/index.html#RLTVNMBR . It uses
Moin,
I wounder why noone noticed before: ft_sql.txt is not mentioned in
help.txt. Already reported to Bram.
BTW: I noticed this, while I updated vimhelp-de to the 72 release.
As usual available from http://www.florianrehnisch.de/vimhelp/.
Now in ZIP format as well.
Thanks,
flori
sc, 23.08.2008:
In view of that, I wonder if the enthusiastic users of this plugin have ever
tested my patch, which is a lot more usable at this time.
a lot more useable than what?
than the plugin
you are asking me to patch no
fewer than 22 modules:
[...]
rebuild and re-install
Markus Heidelberg wrote:
Charles E. Campbell, Jr., 19.08.2008:
Tony Mechelynck wrote:
On 18/08/08 22:15, Charles Campbell wrote:
I've issued a new plugin on my website:
http://mysite.verizon.net/astronaut/vim/index.html#RLTVNMBR . It uses
the signs capability of huge
On 23/08/08 18:09, Markus Heidelberg wrote:
sc, 23.08.2008:
In view of that, I wonder if the enthusiastic users of this plugin have ever
tested my patch, which is a lot more usable at this time.
a lot more useable than what?
than the plugin
you are asking me to patch no
fewer than 22
New to submitting a patch. Please let me know how to submit if folks agree
with this patch. :-) Thanks!
Attach the diff:
Index: src/gui_mac.c
===
--- src/gui_mac.c (revision 1164)
+++ src/gui_mac.c (working copy)
@@ -173,6 +173,7 @@
On 24/08/08 01:58, .幻想之诚 wrote:
Is that a bug, Tony?
I think so; but I suppose Bram would know better than I what causes it.
A little trial and error seems to indicate that if the lower and upper
bounds differ by 256 or less (i.e. if there are at most 257 values in
range) the search proceeds
Hi,
After applying this patch to Vim 7.2, I got following errors while
trying to use K command (and shell also freezes after getting the
errors). I tried to reproduce them with a stable scenario, but
couldn't find a reasonable one. And also, K command sometimes works as
expected, too.
I don't
Hi,
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 12:24 AM, LC Mi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
New to submitting a patch. Please let me know how to submit if folks agree
with this patch. :-) Thanks!
As the last one touching the Carbon vim GUI code, I'd say this patch
looks fine for me.
However you may want to check
2008/8/23 Jelle Geerts [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello,
When allocating memory, lalloc() is called, which uses mch_avail_mem(). But
mch_avail_mem() sometimes fails. It returns the available physical memory +
available page file memory, which can sometimes wrap around 32-bits.
Also,
Here's what seems like a really stupid question:
What's the simplest way to move the cursor to the start of the word under
it?
Under it includes the word after the cursor if there's no identifier under
it.
None of these quite work:
b - The obvious choice, but won't work if the cursor is
Bjorn Winckler wrote:
2008/8/22 Gary Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 2008-08-22, bjrn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This may not be the right place for this post, but it seems like I've
come across a bug so I am posting here.
If I type
:args file1.m file1.h file2.m
then I expect
On 24/08/08 06:56, Robert Webb wrote:
Here's what seems like a really stupid question:
What's the simplest way to move the cursor to the start of the word under
it?
Under it includes the word after the cursor if there's no identifier under
it.
None of these quite work:
b - The obvious
19 matches
Mail list logo
