Re: Patch 7.3.202

2011-05-28 Fir de Conversatie H Xu
On 05/28/2011 03:49 AM, Danek Duvall wrote: I'm getting an error applying this, after having applied all previous patches to the 7.3 tarball: [...] Normally this is just fine. In fact, patches 191 and 196 were the only other patches that reported even needing an offset. Hello Danek Duvall, I

Re: Compiling Vim with X on Mac

2011-05-28 Fir de Conversatie Ben Schmidt
[redirected from vim_use to vim_dev] Good idea! OK, I got confused. I think in vim.h FEAT_GUI should be defined even when NO_X11_INCLUDES is defined. If there is some place where FEAT_GUI causes trouble then add a check for NO_X11_INCLUDES there. That should be a lot cleaner an avoids

Re: vim 7.3: A few problems with patches

2011-05-28 Fir de Conversatie Ivan Krasilnikov
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 00:19, Bram Moolenaar b...@moolenaar.net wrote: I'm not sure what would be a convenient way to solve this.  Making patches for the runtime files would be the correct thing perhaps? Can't fix what is already broken though. Why not abandon patches altogether? Maintaining

Re: Patch 7.3.203 (typos)

2011-05-28 Fir de Conversatie Bram Moolenaar
Tony Mechelynck wrote: I noticed a few typos in the help text, as follows (please read this using a fixed-width font): Thanks, I'll include the fixes. -- A clear conscience is usually the sign of a bad memory. -- Steven Wright /// Bram Moolenaar --

Re: [PATCH] Export version number to NSIS automatically

2011-05-28 Fir de Conversatie Bram Moolenaar
Guopeng Wen wrote: Currently version numbers are hardcoded in nsis/gvim.nsi, those numbers should be identical to that in the topmost Makefile. The attached patch will export those numbers automatically when build dossrc, so it's no longer necessary to update them for NSIS separately.

Re: Patch 7.3.202

2011-05-28 Fir de Conversatie Danek Duvall
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 07:11:22PM +0800, H Xu wrote: On 05/28/2011 03:49 AM, Danek Duvall wrote: I'm getting an error applying this, after having applied all previous patches to the 7.3 tarball: [...] Normally this is just fine. In fact, patches 191 and 196 were the only other patches

Re: vim 7.3: A few problems with patches

2011-05-28 Fir de Conversatie Bram Moolenaar
Patrick Texier wrote: On Thu, 26 May 2011 22:19:48 +0200, Bram Moolenaar wrote: I'm not sure what would be a convenient way to solve this. Making patches for the runtime files would be the correct thing perhaps? Can't fix what is already broken though. Can you update runtime/doc on

Re: vim 7.3: A few problems with patches

2011-05-28 Fir de Conversatie Birger J . Nordølum
I second this motion! I'm fairly certain that a lot of people would appreciate you come over at Github, and initiate in the social coding :) A lot of scripts are already hoster over at Github as well. Ontopic: I were unable to apply the patches from the FTP server. It stopped at 202. -- You

Re: Patch 7.3.202

2011-05-28 Fir de Conversatie Tony Mechelynck
On 28/05/11 19:59, Danek Duvall wrote: [...] Or perhaps there's a smooth, generic patch-flow I'm not seeing where this problem isn't actually a problem. Thanks, Danek See http://vim.wikia.com/wiki/Getting_the_Vim_source_with_Mercurial Best regards, Tony. -- [District Attorneys] learn in