Re: RFC: Shipping parts of vimerl (Erlang addon for Vim) with Vim

2012-01-15 Fir de Conversatie Thilo Six
Benjamin R. Haskell wrote the following on 15.01.2012 01:54 -- snip -- But, according to comments in the files, there are already files being distributed with Vim that are GPLv2-licensed (and not Vim/GPL dual-licensed, AFAICT): Under runtime/: runtime/ftplugin/logcheck.vim

Re: Performance of joining lines by backslash in Vim scripts.

2012-01-15 Fir de Conversatie mattn
I could apply this patch like following. # curl https://raw.github.com/gist/1598921/gistfile1.diff | patch -p1 -- You received this message from the vim_dev maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php

Re: RFC: Shipping parts of vimerl (Erlang addon for Vim) with Vim

2012-01-15 Fir de Conversatie Bram Moolenaar
Ben Haskell wrote: On Sat, 14 Jan 2012, Bram Moolenaar wrote: Per Andersson wrote: On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 1:44 PM, Bram Moolenaar b...@moolenaar.net wrote: There already is an Erlang syntax and indent file.  Maintainer is Csaba Hoch.  Can you please get in touch and merg the

Re: RFC: Shipping parts of vimerl (Erlang addon for Vim) with Vim

2012-01-15 Fir de Conversatie Bram Moolenaar
Ben Haskell wrote: On Sat, 14 Jan 2012, Benjamin R. Haskell wrote: But, according to comments in the files, there are already files being distributed with Vim that are GPLv2-licensed (and not Vim/GPL dual-licensed, AFAICT): [...] And under src/: src/sha256.c Sorry:

Re: RFC: Shipping parts of vimerl (Erlang addon for Vim) with Vim

2012-01-15 Fir de Conversatie Bram Moolenaar
Thilo Six wrote: Thilo Six wrote the following on 15.01.2012 14:12 Benjamin R. Haskell wrote the following on 15.01.2012 01:54 -- snip -- But, according to comments in the files, there are already files being distributed with Vim that are GPLv2-licensed (and not Vim/GPL

Re: RFC: Shipping parts of vimerl (Erlang addon for Vim) with Vim

2012-01-15 Fir de Conversatie Thilo Six
Bram Moolenaar wrote the following on 15.01.2012 16:42 Thilo Six wrote: Thilo Six wrote the following on 15.01.2012 14:12 Benjamin R. Haskell wrote the following on 15.01.2012 01:54 -- snip -- But, according to comments in the files, there are already files being distributed with Vim

Re: RFC: Shipping parts of vimerl (Erlang addon for Vim) with Vim

2012-01-15 Fir de Conversatie Bram Moolenaar
Thilo Six wrote: -- snip -- Under runtime/: runtime/ftplugin/logcheck.vim runtime/ftplugin/debchangelog.vim runtime/spell/ga/ga_IE.diff runtime/spell/gl/gl_ES.diff runtime/spell/gd/gd_GB.diff runtime/spell/sv/sv_SE.diff These slipped by. Let's ask the maintainers to change

Re: RFC: Shipping parts of vimerl (Erlang addon for Vim) with Vim

2012-01-15 Fir de Conversatie Bram Moolenaar
Thilo Six wrote: -- snip -- It would be nice if we clean these up to use the Vim license. For files that are also distributed elsewhere, such a the CMake stuff, it would be nice to also allow the Vim license. Thilo, would you be willing to contact the authors? Here is the mail i

Can't pass multibute arguments in UserCommand.

2012-01-15 Fir de Conversatie mattn
When :source following script, if pass multibute string which include 0x5c in trail byte to the command, E114, E116 occur. - scriptencoding utf-8 function! s:Foo(s) echo a:s endfunction command! -nargs=? Foo1 :call SIDFoo(args) command! -nargs=? Foo2 :call SIDFoo(f-args) command!