Ben Fritz wrote:
--=_Part_1625_1020240385.1421465043545
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
On Friday, January 16, 2015 at 4:55:44 PM UTC-6, Christian Brabandt wrote:
Hi Bram!
On Fr, 16 Jan 2015, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Christian Brabandt wrote:
Hm, we already
On Monday, January 12, 2015 at 10:32:49 AM UTC-4, brosaj wrote:
I wrote a patch to correct some problems with continuation lines inside
if clauses.
...
Albert Oliver
Thanks to Albert for bringing these issues up. A more robust solution has been
found. An updated fortran indent script has
Addendum: Typo: Gesamtausabe = Gesamtausgabe
--
--
You received this message from the vim_dev maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to
On 16/01/2015 10:19 p.m., Ken Takata wrote:
Hi Cesar,
2015/1/16 Fri 23:56:08 UTC+9 Cesar wrote:
By compiling vim with DIRECTX=yes on Windows 7 with MinGW I get:
--
[...]
gcc -c -Iproto -DWIN32 ... gui_dwrite.cpp -o gobjZi386/gui_dwrite.o
gui_dwrite.cpp:21:20: fatal error:
Hirohito Higashi wrote:
Hi Bram and list,
I found a strange code.
ins_compl_bs() in src/edit.c : L3397
3393 /* Stop completion when the whole word was deleted. For Omni
completion
3394 * allow the word to be deleted, we won't match everything. */
3395 if ((int)(p -
Reiner Herrmann wrote:
Hi!
While working on Debian's “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that vim has produced different documentation files on two successive builds
[2].
In one run a generated HTML file didn't contain links to tags, but did
so on another run (in an
1) Open the attached file test.txt.
2) set ts=80
3) /\%80vGesamtausabe
Contrary to the behavior in 560 (Windows 7, MinGW64), only the term
Gesamtausgabe in the second line is marked.
--
--
You received this message from the vim_dev maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you
On Thursday, December 18, 2014 at 9:01:14 AM UTC+13, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Patch 7.4.560
...
Files:src/ops.c
I get a compile warning on this with gcc 4.9.2
ops.c: In function ‘read_viminfo_register’:
ops.c:5758:21: warning: ‘new_width’ may be used uninitialized in this function
On Sunday, January 18, 2015 at 7:52:46 AM UTC+13, Axel Bender wrote:
1) Open the attached file test.txt.
2) set ts=80
3) /\%80vGesamtausabe
Contrary to the behavior in 560 (Windows 7, MinGW64), only the term
Gesamtausgabe in the second line is marked.
I see this in 7.4.580, linux amd64.
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 08:31:16PM -0800, h_east wrote:
Hi James,
2015/1/17(Sat) 9:56:56 UTC+9 James McCoy:
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 02:45:49PM -0800, h_east wrote:
Hi Bram and list,
I found a strange code.
ins_compl_bs() in src/edit.c : L3397
3393 /* Stop completion
Hi Ben!
On Fr, 16 Jan 2015, Ben Fritz wrote:
On Friday, January 16, 2015 at 4:55:44 PM UTC-6, Christian Brabandt wrote:
Hi Bram!
On Fr, 16 Jan 2015, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Christian Brabandt wrote:
Hm, we already have special cases C-[Left|Right] and S-[Left|Right]
to
Comment #4 on issue 212 by chrisbr...@googlemail.com: feedkeys(., n)
inside a macro inserts @. register instead of repeating last operation
https://code.google.com/p/vim/issues/detail?id=212
I think another argument for feedkeys would be too complicated. After
thinking a bit more, I think,
Hi,
Consider the following chain of commands:
$ vim -u NONE
:file test
:!echo %:80
It outputs test0. With %:79 it outputs test:79, %:81 - test1,
%:89 - test9, %:90 - test:90. Something is off, don't you think?
I'm attaching the output of bugreport.vim script.
Regards,
Yuri
--
--
You
On Saturday, January 17, 2015 at 3:21:07 PM UTC+1, Yuri Kanivetsky wrote:
Consider the following chain of commands:
$ vim -u NONE
:file test
:!echo %:80
It outputs test0. With %:79 it outputs test:79, %:81 - test1,
%:89 - test9, %:90 - test:90. Something is off, don't you think?
Um, I now see, what :8 means... (
http://vimdoc.sourceforge.net/htmldoc/cmdline.html#filename-modifiers)
--
--
You received this message from the vim_dev maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 8:56 AM, v...@googlecode.com wrote:
Comment #4 on issue 212 by chrisbr...@googlemail.com: feedkeys(., n)
inside a macro inserts @. register instead of repeating last operation
https://code.google.com/p/vim/issues/detail?id=212
I think another argument for feedkeys
2015-01-17 1:55 GMT+03:00 Christian Brabandt cbli...@256bit.org:
Hi Bram!
On Fr, 16 Jan 2015, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Christian Brabandt wrote:
On Fr, 16 Jan 2015, Ben Fritz wrote:
The problem is, there is no way to move the cursor in insert mode,
without breaking the undo
17 matches
Mail list logo
