Re: Patch 7.4.833

2015-08-26 Fir de Conversatie John Marriott
On 26-Aug-2015 5:27 AM, Bram Moolenaar wrote: John Marriott wrote: On 25-Aug-2015 11:40 PM, Bram Moolenaar wrote: Patch 7.4.833 Problem:More side effects of :set all are missing. (Björn Linse) Solution: Call didset_options() and add didset_options2() to collect more

Re: Question regarding :normal

2015-08-26 Fir de Conversatie Charles Campbell
Quinn Strahl wrote: On Wednesday, 26 August 2015 01:31:34 UTC-4, Justin M. Keyes wrote: On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 10:00 PM, Quinn Strahl qstr...@gmail.com wrote: A difference in behaviour between :g and :rangenormal recently frustrated me, and I wonder if it's up for debate: :g does a pass

Re: Mail from Vim Github Repository

2015-08-26 Fir de Conversatie Christian Brabandt
On Mo, 24 Aug 2015, Alejandro Exojo wrote: El Monday 24 August 2015, Christian Brabandt escribió: I am not going to start rewriting mails, that are sent from github. It's just a simple forwarding, since the original github notification mail is rejected by the google groups page. Note

Re: Question regarding :normal

2015-08-26 Fir de Conversatie Quinn Strahl
On Wednesday, 26 August 2015 12:15:44 UTC-4, Charles Campbell wrote: Quinn Strahl wrote: On Wednesday, 26 August 2015 01:31:34 UTC-4, Justin M. Keyes wrote: On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 10:00 PM, Quinn Strahl qstr...@gmail.com wrote: A difference in behaviour between :g and :rangenormal

Patch 7.4.839

2015-08-26 Fir de Conversatie Bram Moolenaar
Patch 7.4.839 Problem:Compiler warning on 64-bit system. Solution: Add cast to int. (Mike Williams) Files: src/search.c *** ../vim-7.4.838/src/search.c 2015-08-13 23:28:38.246878308 +0200 --- src/search.c2015-08-26 22:58:31.183512457 +0200 *** *** 1801,1807

Re: Patch 7.4.833

2015-08-26 Fir de Conversatie Bram Moolenaar
John Marriott wrote: On 26-Aug-2015 5:27 AM, Bram Moolenaar wrote: John Marriott wrote: On 25-Aug-2015 11:40 PM, Bram Moolenaar wrote: Patch 7.4.833 Problem:More side effects of :set all are missing. (Björn Linse) Solution: Call didset_options() and add

Patch 7.4.841

2015-08-26 Fir de Conversatie Bram Moolenaar
Patch 7.4.841 Problem:Can't compile without the multi-byte feature. (John Marriott) Solution: Add more #ifdef's. Files: src/option.c *** ../vim-7.4.840/src/option.c 2015-08-25 21:27:31.312156958 +0200 --- src/option.c2015-08-26 23:18:39.122134709 +0200 *** ***

Re: Patch 7.4.829

2015-08-26 Fir de Conversatie Bram Moolenaar
Jürgen Krämer wrote: Bram Moolenaar schrieb am 25.08.2015 um 12:27: Patch 7.4.829 Problem:Crash when clicking in beval balloon. (Travis Lebsock) Solution: Use PostMessage() instead of DestroyWindow(). (Raymond Ko, PR 298) Files: src/gui_w32.c ***

Patch 7.4.840

2015-08-26 Fir de Conversatie Bram Moolenaar
Patch 7.4.840 (after 7.4.829) Problem:Tooltip window stays open. Solution: Send a WM_CLOSE message. (Jurgen Kramer) Files: src/gui_w32.c *** ../vim-7.4.839/src/gui_w32.c2015-08-25 12:21:23.583957205 +0200 --- src/gui_w32.c 2015-08-26 23:10:03.847838259 +0200

Re: Patch 7.4.840

2015-08-26 Fir de Conversatie Yegappan Lakshmanan
Hi, Based on the following posts: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/oldnewthing/archive/2011/09/26/10216420.aspx http://blogs.msdn.com/b/oldnewthing/archive/2005/07/27/443824.aspx sending a WM_CLOSE and WM_NCDESTROY message to a window is not the same as calling DestroyWindow(). So I think the original

Re: Patch 7.4.829

2015-08-26 Fir de Conversatie 'Jürgen Krämer' via vim_dev
Hi, Bram Moolenaar schrieb am 25.08.2015 um 12:27: Patch 7.4.829 Problem:Crash when clicking in beval balloon. (Travis Lebsock) Solution: Use PostMessage() instead of DestroyWindow(). (Raymond Ko, PR 298) Files: src/gui_w32.c *** ../vim-7.4.828/src/gui_w32.c 2015-08-11

Re: Question regarding :normal

2015-08-26 Fir de Conversatie Quinn Strahl
On Wednesday, 26 August 2015 01:31:34 UTC-4, Justin M. Keyes wrote: On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 10:00 PM, Quinn Strahl qstr...@gmail.com wrote: A difference in behaviour between :g and :rangenormal recently frustrated me, and I wonder if it's up for debate: :g does a pass on matching lines

Re: Patch 7.4.840

2015-08-26 Fir de Conversatie Raymond Ko
On Wednesday, August 26, 2015 at 5:33:47 PM UTC-4, yega...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Based on the following posts: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/oldnewthing/archive/2011/09/26/10216420.aspx http://blogs.msdn.com/b/oldnewthing/archive/2005/07/27/443824.aspx sending a WM_CLOSE and WM_NCDESTROY

Re: Mail from Vim Github Repository

2015-08-26 Fir de Conversatie Christian Brabandt
Am 2015-08-27 06:35, schrieb LCD 47: On 26 August 2015, Christian Brabandt cbli...@256bit.org wrote: [...] Also I added an Mail-Followup-To header, so depending on the reply method you use, a reply might end up at github as well (which needs to be tested). [...] Does Outlook pay attention

Re: Patch 7.4.840

2015-08-26 Fir de Conversatie 'Jürgen Krämer' via vim_dev
Hi, Yegappan Lakshmanan schrieb am 26.08.2015 um 23:33: Based on the following posts: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/oldnewthing/archive/2011/09/26/10216420.aspx http://blogs.msdn.com/b/oldnewthing/archive/2005/07/27/443824.aspx sending a WM_CLOSE and WM_NCDESTROY message to a window is not

Re: Mail from Vim Github Repository

2015-08-26 Fir de Conversatie LCD 47
On 26 August 2015, Christian Brabandt cbli...@256bit.org wrote: [...] Also I added an Mail-Followup-To header, so depending on the reply method you use, a reply might end up at github as well (which needs to be tested). [...] Does Outlook pay attention to Mail-Followup-To these days? Does

Re: Patch 7.4.840

2015-08-26 Fir de Conversatie Yegappan Lakshmanan
Hi, On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 5:15 PM, Raymond Ko raymond.w...@gmail.com wrote: On Wednesday, August 26, 2015 at 5:33:47 PM UTC-4, yega...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Based on the following posts: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/oldnewthing/archive/2011/09/26/10216420.aspx

Re: Repository cleanup (Was: Preparations for moving to github)

2015-08-26 Fir de Conversatie Ben Fritz
On Tuesday, August 25, 2015 at 12:55:29 PM UTC-5, Markus Heidelberg wrote: Am Dienstag, 25. August 2015, 17:42:26 schrieb Christian Brabandt: Did the .gitignore file change between the old googlecode repository and the new github repository? I get a modification here: diff --git