I started noticing odd behavior from cscope recently, so I ran 'git
bisect' and found the problem at this commit:
$ git bisect good
dc21552c9a83413a018a91e61649cc632929d6a1 is the first bad commit
commit dc21552c9a83413a018a91e61649cc632929d6a1
Author: Bram Moolenaar
Date:
Ernie Rael wrote:
> >> I've got another case, thought I'd try to create a test, but I've never
> >> played with screen-dump stuff before. I'm getting there.
> > That would be ideal, but just a short script to reproduce the problem,
> > which can be turned into a test, would also do.
> >
>
Patch 9.0.0735
Problem:Breakindent and scrolloff tests fail.
Solution: Temporarily skip the assertions.
Files: src/testdir/test_breakindent.vim, src/testdir/test_normal.vim
*** ../vim-9.0.0734/src/testdir/test_breakindent.vim2022-10-06
21:24:30.537632966 +0100
---
Patch 9.0.0734
Problem:Cursor position invalid when scrolling with 'smoothscroll' set.
(Ernie Rael)
Solution: Add w_valid_skipcol and clear flags when it changes. Adjust
w_skipcol after moving the cursor.
Files: src/structs.h, src/move.c, src/proto/move.pro,
On Tuesday, October 11, 2022 at 4:58:02 AM UTC-4 Wolf wrote:
> Currently else is indented like this:
>
> (cond (else
> foo))
> That does not match typical indentation used, which would be:
>
> (cond (else
> foo))
>
(Using the groups.google client) I cannot see the difference; probably
Don't change it; it's (relatively) easy to `:setlocal lispwords-=if` for
any relevant filetypes.
On Tuesday, October 11, 2022 at 6:39:19 AM UTC-4 Bram Moolenaar wrote:
>
> > Currently if indents like:
> >
> > (if #t
> > a
> > b)
> >
> > That seems to be bit unusual, so this commit drops if
Thanks Bram for re-enabling +rightleft +arabic!
I'll still be compiling 5 builds of Vim, some of them as a sanity test
for various compile-time featuresets, as follows:
• vi: a minimum build with as few features as possible and in
particular -eval and no GUI
• vim-small: a build with -eval but
Thank you, Bram -
I don't usually view the newsgroup, which is why I didn't see the
discussion around this. I certainly would have jumped in had I noticed it.
Best regards,
Ron
On Wednesday, October 12, 2022 at 12:56:59 PM UTC+3 Bram Moolenaar wrote:
>
> Ron Aaron wrote:
>
> > I, for one, use
Patch 9.0.0733
Problem:Use of strftime() is not safe.
Solution: Check the return value of strftime(). Use a larger buffer and
correctly pass the available space. (Dominique Pellé, closes
#11348)
Files: src/time.c
*** ../vim-9.0.0732/src/time.c 2022-10-07
Patch 9.0.0732
Problem:No check for white space before and after "=<<". (Doug Kearns)
Solution: Check for white space in Vim9 script. (closes #11351)
Files: src/evalvars.c, src/testdir/test_vim9_assign.vim
*** ../vim-9.0.0731/src/evalvars.c 2022-10-01 19:43:48.606494048 +0100
Patch 9.0.0731
Problem:clang-tidy configuration files are not recognized.
Solution: Recognize clang-tidy files as yaml. (closes #11350)
Files: runtime/filetype.vim, src/testdir/test_filetype.vim
*** ../vim-9.0.0730/runtime/filetype.vim2022-10-10 12:08:55.850043934
+0100
---
On 2022-10-11 11:39:07 +0100, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
>
> > Currently else is indented like this:
> >
> > (cond (else
> > foo))
> >
> > That does not match typical indentation used, which would be:
> >
> > (cond (else
> > foo))
> >
> > This commit special-cases "(else" to
Patch 9.0.0730 (after 9.0.0729)
Problem:Startup test fails with right-left feature.
Solution: Do not delete test file too early.
Files: src/testdir/test_startup.vim
*** ../vim-9.0.0729/src/testdir/test_startup.vim2022-10-10
22:39:38.207545888 +0100
---
Patch 9.0.0729 (after 9.0.0696)
Problem:The rightleft and arabic features are disabled.
Solution: Re-enable the features, some users want to use the functionality.
Files: runtime/doc/rileft.txt, src/feature.h
*** ../vim-9.0.0728/runtime/doc/rileft.txt 2022-06-28
Ron Aaron wrote:
> I, for one, use the rightleft functionality all the time, and I believe
> many others do as well. It's not perfect, but it works well enough. Getting
> it yanked out all of a sudden came as a bad surprise.
Thanks for your feedback. I got a couple more remarks like this.
I, for one, use the rightleft functionality all the time, and I believe
many others do as well. It's not perfect, but it works well enough. Getting
it yanked out all of a sudden came as a bad surprise.
On Sunday, October 9, 2022 at 7:21:42 PM UTC+3 Tony Mechelynck wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 9, 2022
I just rebuilt gvim, and to my unhappiness, "--enable-rightleft" does not
in fact enable +rightleft.
I need that functionality, I've used it for a very long time. Please
re-enable it.
On Sunday, October 9, 2022 at 11:09:16 PM UTC+3 Yee Cheng Chin wrote:
> I think another aspect of this is
17 matches
Mail list logo
