On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 9:04 AM, Antony Scriven [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 31/03/2008, Ian Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
I did a couple informal benchmarks when I preparing for
a short talk I gave at my school. The slides are at
http://vim-soc
Sorry to get back to you so late - here's what I can offer:
As far as I'm aware, the code in the vim71-ian branch of the
repository contains almost all of the stable work done by both myself
and Xiaozhou, so that's the best place to look. There's a bunch of
testing code in that branch as well,
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 5:54 PM, Ian Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry to get back to you so late - here's what I can offer:
As far as I'm aware, the code in the vim71-ian branch of the
repository contains almost all of the stable work done by both myself
and Xiaozhou, so that's
Here's another problem with changing behavior in the new engine: we
would have to modify the backtracking engine as well to prevent it
from using ordered alternation. Since our new engine can't handle
certain things and falls back to the old one, they must behave the
same. For example, we can't
