Re: [RFC] Script line numbers in error messages

2013-09-27 Fir de Conversatie Axel Bender
I'd also like this same feature when it comes to debugging: e.g. function Rename..SNR1_DoArea..S_Rename..SNR1_AnalyzeLine line 17: ... is less easy to read than (e.g.) function Rename..SNR1_DoArea..S_Rename..SNR1_AnalyzeLine line 173 (AnalyzeLine 17): ... -- -- You received this

Re: [RFC] Script line numbers in error messages

2013-09-27 Fir de Conversatie ZyX
On Friday, September 27, 2013 12:21:49 PM UTC+4, Axel Bender wrote: I'd also like this same feature when it comes to debugging: e.g. function Rename..SNR1_DoArea..S_Rename..SNR1_AnalyzeLine line 17: ... is less easy to read than (e.g.) function

[RFC] Script line numbers in error messages

2013-09-26 Fir de Conversatie Nikolay Pavlov
There one inconvenient thing in error messages: they come with line numbers relative to the function start. This means to see the line that caused the error you either need to use :fu or find function name in a file (and file is only seen with :verb fu), be sure you open all folds contained in a

Re: [RFC] Script line numbers in error messages

2013-09-26 Fir de Conversatie LCD 47
On 26 September 2013, Nikolay Pavlov zyx@gmail.com wrote: There one inconvenient thing in error messages: they come with line numbers relative to the function start. This means to see the line that caused the error you either need to use :fu or find function name in a file (and file is

Re: [RFC] Script line numbers in error messages

2013-09-26 Fir de Conversatie Nikolay Pavlov
On Sep 27, 2013 12:29 AM, LCD 47 lcd...@gmail.com wrote: On 26 September 2013, Nikolay Pavlov zyx@gmail.com wrote: There one inconvenient thing in error messages: they come with line numbers relative to the function start. This means to see the line that caused the error you either