Hi,
2018/9/14 Fri 0:21:19 UTC+9 Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> Hirohito Higashi wrote:
>
> > :echo has('patch-8.1.0')
> > 0
> >
> > This should return 1.
> > A patch attached.
> >
> > NOTE:
> > This issue was reported by Takuya Fujiwara.
>
> As Tony mentioned, 8.1.0 isn't really a patch, it is a
Hirohito Higashi wrote:
> :echo has('patch-8.1.0')
> 0
>
> This should return 1.
> A patch attached.
>
> NOTE:
> This issue was reported by Takuya Fujiwara.
As Tony mentioned, 8.1.0 isn't really a patch, it is a release.
Practically we also don't need this change, as checking for Vim 8.1 is
Hi Tony,
2018-9-13(Thu) 14:36:03 UTC+9 Tony Mechelynck:
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 7:32 AM Tony Mechelynck wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 6:42 AM h_east wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Bram and developers,
> > >
> > > :echo has('patch-8.1.0')
> > > 0
> > >
> > > This should return 1.
> > > A patch
On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 7:32 AM Tony Mechelynck
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 6:42 AM h_east wrote:
> >
> > Hi Bram and developers,
> >
> > :echo has('patch-8.1.0')
> > 0
> >
> > This should return 1.
> > A patch attached.
> >
> > NOTE:
> > This issue was reported by Takuya Fujiwara.
> >
>
On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 6:42 AM h_east wrote:
>
> Hi Bram and developers,
>
> :echo has('patch-8.1.0')
> 0
>
> This should return 1.
> A patch attached.
>
> NOTE:
> This issue was reported by Takuya Fujiwara.
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Hirohito Higashi (h_east)
I disagree.
There never was a patch
Hi Bram and developers,
:echo has('patch-8.1.0')
0
This should return 1.
A patch attached.
NOTE:
This issue was reported by Takuya Fujiwara.
--
Best regards,
Hirohito Higashi (h_east)
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the
