On 15/09/08 21:22, James Vega wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 08:57:59PM +0200, Rhialto wrote:
>> The link you have there,
>> http://groups.google.com/group/vim_dev/attach/10fa0944a8b643b4/vim-7.2-relativenumber-02.patch?part=2
>> , redirects (now, maybe not before?) to
>> http://vim_dev.googlegr
James Vega wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 08:57:59PM +0200, Rhialto wrote:
>
>> The link you have there,
>> http://groups.google.com/group/vim_dev/attach/10fa0944a8b643b4/vim-7.2-relativenumber-02.patch?part=2
>> , redirects (now, maybe not before?) to
>> http://vim_dev.googlegroups.com/attac
On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 08:57:59PM +0200, Rhialto wrote:
> The link you have there,
> http://groups.google.com/group/vim_dev/attach/10fa0944a8b643b4/vim-7.2-relativenumber-02.patch?part=2
> , redirects (now, maybe not before?) to
> http://vim_dev.googlegroups.com/attach/10fa0944a8b643b4/vim-7.2-re
Matthew Winn wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 21:09:29 +0200, Tony Mechelynck
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> What do you mean, they aren't allowed? Not only do all the Vim Google
>> Groups include an underscore in their names, when I click that link (in
>> SeaMonkey on openSUSE Linux 11.0) I
On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 21:09:29 +0200, Tony Mechelynck
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What do you mean, they aren't allowed? Not only do all the Vim Google
> Groups include an underscore in their names, when I click that link (in
> SeaMonkey on openSUSE Linux 11.0) I get a page saying "Found. Please
On 14/09/08 20:57, Rhialto wrote:
> On Mon 18 Aug 2008 at 16:15:10 -0400, Charles Campbell wrote:
>> Hello!
>>
>> I've issued a new plugin on my website:
>> http://mysite.verizon.net/astronaut/vim/index.html#RLTVNMBR . It uses
>
> The link you have there,
> http://groups.google.com/group/vim_dev/
On Mon 18 Aug 2008 at 16:15:10 -0400, Charles Campbell wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> I've issued a new plugin on my website:
> http://mysite.verizon.net/astronaut/vim/index.html#RLTVNMBR . It uses
The link you have there,
http://groups.google.com/group/vim_dev/attach/10fa0944a8b643b4/vim-7.2-relati
Markus Heidelberg wrote:
> Tony Mechelynck, 24.08.2008:
> >
> > OTOH, I would have nothing against both above-mentioned patches being
> > incorporated into the mainline sources, Bill's patch as part of the
> > +float feature, and your relative-numbers patch either as standard or as
> > anoth
Tony Mechelynck, 26.08.2008:
>
> On 26/08/08 23:38, Markus Heidelberg wrote:
> > Tony Mechelynck, 24.08.2008:
> >> OTOH, I would have nothing against both above-mentioned patches being
> >> incorporated into the mainline sources, Bill's patch as part of the
> >> +float feature, and your relative-
Ben Fritz, 25.08.2008:
>
> I have not tried the patch, because it is too much trouble for me to
> compile my own Vim on Windows. Yes, I'm on vim-dev, but a lot of
> vimscript stuff and discussion of features/bugs happens that does not
> require me to compile my own Vim or try out 3rd-party patche
On 26/08/08 23:38, Markus Heidelberg wrote:
> Tony Mechelynck, 24.08.2008:
>> OTOH, I would have nothing against both above-mentioned patches being
>> incorporated into the mainline sources, Bill's patch as part of the
>> +float feature, and your relative-numbers patch either as standard or as
>>
Charles Campbell, 24.08.2008:
>
> I'll update the link to your patch (when I get a chance -- I'm still
> updating vim on this machine+o/s). I hope you don't consider my plugin
> a competitor, I thought of it as more of a step towards your patch (whet
> folks' appetites, as it were) -- and may
Tony Mechelynck, 24.08.2008:
>
> OTOH, I would have nothing against both above-mentioned patches being
> incorporated into the mainline sources, Bill's patch as part of the
> +float feature, and your relative-numbers patch either as standard or as
> another optional feature (I suppose the latt
On Aug 25, 11:05 am, Ben Fritz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Aug 25, 10:29 am, Charles Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > OK -- I've made a reporting-only variable, g:rltvnmbrmode (=1 enabled,
> > =0 disabled) for this purpose (v3b).
>
> Hey, thanks!
>
> Should that be b:rltvnmbrmode,
On Aug 25, 10:29 am, Charles Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> OK -- I've made a reporting-only variable, g:rltvnmbrmode (=1 enabled,
> =0 disabled) for this purpose (v3b).
>
Hey, thanks!
Should that be b:rltvnmbrmode, since signs (and therefore the plugin)
work local to a buffer?
As you'
Ben Fritz wrote:
>
> On Aug 23, 6:20 pm, Charles Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>> I'll update the link to your patch (when I get a chance -- I'm still
>> updating vim on this machine+o/s). I hope you don't consider my plugin
>> a competitor, I thought of it as more of a step towards
On Aug 23, 6:20 pm, Charles Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I'll update the link to your patch (when I get a chance -- I'm still
> updating vim on this machine+o/s). I hope you don't consider my plugin
> a competitor, I thought of it as more of a step towards your patch (whet
> folks' app
On 23/08/08 18:09, Markus Heidelberg wrote:
> sc, 23.08.2008:
>>> In view of that, I wonder if the enthusiastic users of this plugin have ever
>>> tested my patch, which is a lot more usable at this time.
>> a lot more useable than what?
>
> than the plugin
>
>> you are asking me to patch no
>> fe
Markus Heidelberg wrote:
> Charles E. Campbell, Jr., 19.08.2008:
>
>> Tony Mechelynck wrote:
>>
>>> On 18/08/08 22:15, Charles Campbell wrote:
>>>
>>>
I've issued a new plugin on my website:
http://mysite.verizon.net/astronaut/vim/index.html#RLTVNMBR . It uses
the
sc, 23.08.2008:
>
> > In view of that, I wonder if the enthusiastic users of this plugin have ever
> > tested my patch, which is a lot more usable at this time.
>
> a lot more useable than what?
than the plugin
> you are asking me to patch no
> fewer than 22 modules:
> [...]
>
> rebuild and r
On Saturday 23 August 2008 07:24, Markus Heidelberg wrote:
>
> Charles E. Campbell, Jr., 19.08.2008:
> >
> > Tony Mechelynck wrote:
> > > On 18/08/08 22:15, Charles Campbell wrote:
> > >
> > >> I've issued a new plugin on my website:
> > >> http://mysite.verizon.net/astronaut/vim/index.html#R
Charles E. Campbell, Jr., 19.08.2008:
>
> Tony Mechelynck wrote:
> > On 18/08/08 22:15, Charles Campbell wrote:
> >
> >> I've issued a new plugin on my website:
> >> http://mysite.verizon.net/astronaut/vim/index.html#RLTVNMBR . It uses
> >> the signs capability of "huge" vim to give relative
Tony Mechelynck wrote:
> On 18/08/08 22:15, Charles Campbell wrote:
>
>> Hello!
>>
>> I've issued a new plugin on my website:
>> http://mysite.verizon.net/astronaut/vim/index.html#RLTVNMBR . It uses
>> the signs capability of "huge" vim to give relative numbering. After
>> some comment period
On 19/08/08 18:26, Charles Campbell wrote:
[...]
> Hmm -- this is the second time that I've uploaded a file and there's
> been a delay in its appearing. I thought it was my browser last time
> just "saving time" by serving up a file it had already downloaded. Now
> I'm not so sure what's happeni
guivho wrote:
> Charles Campbell wrote:
>> guivho wrote:
>>> [snip]
>>> I downloaded it, but it claims to be v1c, despite what your website
>>> says.
>>>
>> Hello!
>>
>> Looks like a problem with my updating scripts -- found it, and v2b is
>> now up on my website.
>
> So it claims, but I'm afraid
guivho wrote:
> Charles Campbell wrote:
>
>> guivho wrote:
>>
>>> [snip]
>>> I downloaded it, but it claims to be v1c, despite what your website
>>> says.
>>>
>>>
>> Hello!
>>
>> Looks like a problem with my updating scripts -- found it, and v2b is
>> now up on my website.
>>
>
Charles Campbell wrote:
> guivho wrote:
>> [snip]
>> I downloaded it, but it claims to be v1c, despite what your website
>> says.
>>
> Hello!
>
> Looks like a problem with my updating scripts -- found it, and v2b is
> now up on my website.
So it claims, but I'm afraid it's still v1c.
Guido
>
>
guivho wrote:
> [snip]
> I downloaded it, but it claims to be v1c, despite what your website
> says.
>
Hello!
Looks like a problem with my updating scripts -- found it, and v2b is
now up on my website.
Thank you for letting me know! I seldom download my own plugins as you
might imagine.
R
Charles Campbell wrote:
> sc wrote:
>> On Tuesday 19 August 2008 09:50, Charles Campbell wrote:
>>
>>> sc wrote:
>>>
thank *you* -- it looks really useful
now can you help me make a toggle for it, so i don't need to
burn two mappings for it? like for example instead of
sa
sc wrote:
> On Tuesday 19 August 2008 09:50, Charles Campbell wrote:
>
>> sc wrote:
>>
>>> thank *you* -- it looks really useful
>>>
>>> now can you help me make a toggle for it, so i don't need to
>>> burn two mappings for it? like for example instead of
>>> saying "RltvNmbr is already e
On Tuesday 19 August 2008 09:50, Charles Campbell wrote:
>
> sc wrote:
> > thank *you* -- it looks really useful
> >
> > now can you help me make a toggle for it, so i don't need to
> > burn two mappings for it? like for example instead of
> > saying "RltvNmbr is already enabled", which i can pl
On Tuesday 19 August 2008 09:50, Charles Campbell wrote:
>
> sc wrote:
> > thank *you* -- it looks really useful
> >
> > now can you help me make a toggle for it, so i don't need to
> > burn two mappings for it? like for example instead of
> > saying "RltvNmbr is already enabled", which i can pl
sc wrote:
> thank *you* -- it looks really useful
>
> now can you help me make a toggle for it, so i don't need to
> burn two mappings for it? like for example instead of
> saying "RltvNmbr is already enabled", which i can plainly
> see, why not turn it off?
>
> i looked for a variable i could te
On 18/08/08 22:15, Charles Campbell wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I've issued a new plugin on my website:
> http://mysite.verizon.net/astronaut/vim/index.html#RLTVNMBR . It uses
> the signs capability of "huge" vim to give relative numbering. After
> some comment period I expect to release it on vim.sf.ne
On Monday 18 August 2008 20:39, Charles E. Campbell, Jr. wrote:
>
> sc wrote:
> > On Monday 18 August 2008 15:15, Charles Campbell wrote:
> >
> >> Hello!
> >>
> >> I've issued a new plugin on my website:
> >> http://mysite.verizon.net/astronaut/vim/index.html#RLTVNMBR . It uses
> > why is
sc wrote:
> On Monday 18 August 2008 15:15, Charles Campbell wrote:
>
>> Hello!
>>
>> I've issued a new plugin on my website:
>> http://mysite.verizon.net/astronaut/vim/index.html#RLTVNMBR . It uses
>> the signs capability of "huge" vim to give relative numbering. After
>> some comment pe
Dominique Pelle wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 10:15 PM, Charles Campbell wrote:
>
>
>> Hello!
>>
>> I've issued a new plugin on my website:
>> http://mysite.verizon.net/astronaut/vim/index.html#RLTVNMBR . It uses
>> the signs capability of "huge" vim to give relative numbering. After
>> so
On Monday 18 August 2008 15:15, Charles Campbell wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> I've issued a new plugin on my website:
> http://mysite.verizon.net/astronaut/vim/index.html#RLTVNMBR . It uses
> the signs capability of "huge" vim to give relative numbering. After
> some comment period I expect to re
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 10:15 PM, Charles Campbell wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I've issued a new plugin on my website:
> http://mysite.verizon.net/astronaut/vim/index.html#RLTVNMBR . It uses
> the signs capability of "huge" vim to give relative numbering. After
> some comment period I expect to release
Hello!
I've issued a new plugin on my website:
http://mysite.verizon.net/astronaut/vim/index.html#RLTVNMBR . It uses
the signs capability of "huge" vim to give relative numbering. After
some comment period I expect to release it on vim.sf.net. I'd like to
mention the relative numbering pa
40 matches
Mail list logo
