Dominique Pelle wrote:
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 3:32 AM, Matt Wozniski wrote:
Not sure what's going on here, but I've found a crash that's easy to
reproduce. First, open two X11 enabled vim (not gvim) processes. In
the first, do:
:let @+ = repeat('a', 1024*1024)
in order to store
On 10/09/08 20:34, Dominique Pelle wrote:
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 6:26 PM, Bram Moolenaar[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dominique Pelle wrote:
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 3:32 AM, Matt Wozniski wrote:
Not sure what's going on here, but I've found a crash that's easy to
reproduce. First, open two
Dominique Pelle wrote:
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 3:32 AM, Matt Wozniski wrote:
Not sure what's going on here, but I've found a crash that's easy to
reproduce. First, open two X11 enabled vim (not gvim) processes. In
the first, do:
:let @+ = repeat('a', 1024*1024)
in order to
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 3:32 AM, Matt Wozniski wrote:
Not sure what's going on here, but I've found a crash that's easy to
reproduce. First, open two X11 enabled vim (not gvim) processes. In
the first, do:
:let @+ = repeat('a', 1024*1024)
in order to store 1MB of data to the clipboard.
Not sure what's going on here, but I've found a crash that's easy to
reproduce. First, open two X11 enabled vim (not gvim) processes. In
the first, do:
:let @+ = repeat('a', 1024*1024)
in order to store 1MB of data to the clipboard. The exact amount is
irrelevant, but the larger the size, the
