MSVC make warning about prototype.
https://gist.github.com/1286099
Below is a fixed patch.
diff -r f530aef0d959 src/ex_getln.c
--- a/src/ex_getln.c Wed Oct 12 22:02:14 2011 +0200
+++ b/src/ex_getln.c Fri Oct 14 11:25:08 2011 +0900
@@ -121,6 +121,12 @@
static int ex_window __ARGS((void));
#end
Ingo Karkat wrote:
> On 10/10/2011 03:43 PM, mattn wrote:
> > I hope that functions should be following after global
> > functions. Is this a problem of sort?
> > Currently, functions are there before global functions. it's not
> > useful.
>
> It's a good idea to show the functions last. "Nor
Yasuhiro Matsumoto wrote:
> Ok.
> Bram, If anyone don't object to this changes, please check and include.
>
> https://gist.github.com/1280464
Thanks! I'll add it in the todo list.
--
hundred-and-one symptoms of being an internet addict:
57. You begin to wonder how on earth your service provi
Ok.
Bram, If anyone don't object to this changes, please check and include.
https://gist.github.com/1280464
diff -r 409691084d19 src/eval.c
--- a/src/eval.c Tue Oct 04 21:22:44 2011 +0200
+++ b/src/eval.c Wed Oct 12 15:41:53 2011 +0900
@@ -21735,6 +21735,9 @@
++hi;
fp = HI2UF(hi);
+ if (
On Mon, 10 Oct 2011, mattn wrote:
Thanks for all in this thread.
I still don't assent that vim show functions in complete candidates.
And I wonder why they use ":echo " to get candidate from completion.
I'm thinking who want to know SID are very minorities. And as Ingo
Karkat says, is the c
Thanks for all in this thread.
I still don't assent that vim show functions in complete candidates.
And I wonder why they use ":echo " to get candidate from completion.
I'm thinking who want to know SID are very minorities. And as Ingo Karkat
says, is the cryptic names look intimidating.
As yo
On 10/10/2011 03:43 PM, mattn wrote:
I hope that functions should be following after global
functions. Is this a problem of sort?
Currently, functions are there before global functions. it's not
useful.
It's a good idea to show the functions last. "Normal" users don't
use them, and the cryp
I hope that functions should be following after global functions. Is
this a problem of sort?
Currently, functions are there before global functions. it's not
useful.
However, If I want to find global function leading "z", I may feed that
" functions are not useful for complete".
We should hea
On Sun, October 9, 2011 3:43 pm, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
>
> Christian Brabandt wrote:
>
>> On Sa, 08 Okt 2011, mattn wrote:
>>
>> > Do you mean that vim have better to show candidate like following?
>> (for
>> > example)
>> >
>> > :echo 14_foo
>> >
>> > and type
>> >
>> > :echo 14_foobar
>> >
>> >
On Sun, 9 Oct 2011, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Christian Brabandt wrote:
On Sa, 08 Okt 2011, mattn wrote:
Do you mean that vim have better to show candidate like following?
(for example)
:echo 14_foo
and type
:echo 14_foobar
I think no need to show it.
Please don't turn that feature off.
Christian Brabandt wrote:
> On Sa, 08 Okt 2011, mattn wrote:
>
> > Do you mean that vim have better to show candidate like following? (for
> > example)
> >
> > :echo 14_foo
> >
> > and type
> >
> > :echo 14_foobar
> >
> > I think no need to show it.
>
> Please don't turn that feature off
Hi mattn!
On Sa, 08 Okt 2011, mattn wrote:
> Do you mean that vim have better to show candidate like following? (for
> example)
>
> :echo 14_foo
>
> and type
>
> :echo 14_foobar
>
> I think no need to show it.
Please don't turn that feature off. I use it all the time.
regards,
Christian
On Saturday, October 8, 2011 11:53:08 PM UTC+9, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
>
> Makes sense. I wonder if we should still show the matches when the user
> is explicitly looking for such a function.
>
Do you mean that vim have better to show candidate like following? (for
example)
:echo 14_foo
and
Yasuhiro Matsumoto wrote:
> When you type ':echo ', you can see complete candidates like variables,
> functions, or etc.
> But it include dict functions. For example,
>
> ---
> $ cat foo.vim
> let s:foo = {}
> function! s:foo.bar()
> endfunction
>
> $ vim -u foo.vim -N
> ---
>
> Type
Hi.
When you type ':echo ', you can see complete candidates like variables,
functions, or etc.
But it include dict functions. For example,
---
$ cat foo.vim
let s:foo = {}
function! s:foo.bar()
endfunction
$ vim -u foo.vim -N
---
Type ":echo ", it will be ":echo 1()".
Below is a patch
15 matches
Mail list logo
