On 17/05/11 10:33, Marc Weber wrote:
Can't we make Vim accept custom moves then?
then dX vX =X etc would work where X is the custom vimL code moving the
cursor?
Something like
:setlocal custommovement=camelcase#CamelCaseMovement
What about regions ? Does something like this already exist
Hi Ben!
On Mi, 18 Mai 2011, Ben Schmidt wrote:
The other question is whether a sizeable population works on camelcase
code and would like to have this solved :).
I would like to see a camelcase and/or underscore-seperation movement
commands. But I think if done, it has to be done really
On 17-May-2011 03:42, hari.rangara...@gmail.com wrote:
For the record, I have gone through the solutions at this wiki:
http://vim.wikia.com/wiki/Moving_through_camel_case_words; however, I
was still left wondering if there has been an attempt to solve the
camel case word movement natively in
Can't we make Vim accept custom moves then?
then dX vX =X etc would work where X is the custom vimL code moving the
cursor?
Something like
:setlocal custommovement=camelcase#CamelCaseMovement
What about regions ? Does something like this already exist for
regions?
What's the main point
On 17-May-2011 10:33, Marc Weber wrote:
Can't we make Vim accept custom moves then?
then dX vX =X etc would work where X is the custom vimL code moving the
cursor?
Something like
:setlocal custommovement=camelcase#CamelCaseMovement
And this new setting would affect the word-wise
You can already implement custom motions via :omap; that's what
camelcasemotion
uses.
I've missed that. The first camelcase samples are using (i,n,v)noremap
I think there are many good syncing solutions already out there, and
especially
non-Windows users have a need for keeping several
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 11:36 PM, Ingo Karkat sw...@ingo-karkat.de wrote:
On 17-May-2011 03:42, hari.rangara...@gmail.com wrote:
For the record, I have gone through the solutions at this wiki:
http://vim.wikia.com/wiki/Moving_through_camel_case_words; however, I
was still left wondering if
What's the main point about being native? That you don't have to get
custom .vimrc ?
For me, that would be:
- available everywhere, and therefore:
- beneficial to all users (who are more likely to find the feature in the
help
than in one of thousands of plugins on vim.org which need to
On 17-May-2011 17:07, hari.rangara...@gmail.com wrote:
Ingo -- I did check out your plugin, and I might actually end up using
it regularly :). There were a basic things which caught my eye as
incomplete: Is there a reason you didn't choose to implement the 'ge'
operator?
[code snipped]
The other question is whether a sizeable population works on camelcase
code and would like to have this solved :).
I would like to see a camelcase and/or underscore-seperation movement
commands. But I think if done, it has to be done really carefully so it
doesn't end up using obscure keys or
For the record, I have gone through the solutions at this wiki:
http://vim.wikia.com/wiki/Moving_through_camel_case_words; however, I was
still left wondering if there has been an attempt to solve the camel case
word movement natively in Vim, as a lot of code does use this convention.
I was
Excerpts from hari.rangara...@gmail.com's message of Tue May 17 03:42:19 +0200
2011:
For the record, I have gone through the solutions at this wiki:
http://vim.wikia.com/wiki/Moving_through_camel_case_words; however, I was
still left wondering if there has been an attempt to solve the camel
12 matches
Mail list logo