On Sat, 19 Jul 2008 18:55:38 +0200, Markus Heidelberg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While replying to this mail, I noticed that it would be useful to define own
paragraph boundaries, not only an option for whitespace. I use Gvim as
external editor for KMail and want to delete some paragraphs of
But now
that I think of it... it really seems like a stretch to imagine that
anybody would find fault with the new behavior if it were done this
way (Hey! Paragraph motions are now stopping at all my whitespace-only
lines!!!), but... who knows...? ;-)
Yes, I would consider that
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 18:55, Markus Heidelberg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While replying to this mail, I noticed that it would be useful to define own
paragraph boundaries, not only an option for whitespace.
Yes, if this is done, a generic option would be best.
Richard
On 2008-07-20, Mark Lundquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 20, 2008, at 3:38 AM, Ben Schmidt wrote:
But now
that I think of it... it really seems like a stretch to imagine that
anybody would find fault with the new behavior if it were done this
way (Hey! Paragraph motions are now
On Jul 20, 2008, at 3:38 AM, Ben Schmidt wrote:
But now
that I think of it... it really seems like a stretch to imagine that
anybody would find fault with the new behavior if it were done this
way (Hey! Paragraph motions are now stopping at all my whitespace-
only
lines!!!), but... who
On Jul 19, 2008, at 9:55 AM, Markus Heidelberg wrote:
Your patch is malformed.
- wrapped long line
No way. My patch didn't contain any long lines!
- tabs are spaces
bah... okay, I'll retab it.
- wrong line numbers (why? I'm on svn revision 1114, too)
Weird... that patch is just from
Mark Lundquist, 19.07.2008:
On Jul 19, 2008, at 9:55 AM, Markus Heidelberg wrote:
Your patch is malformed.
- wrapped long line
No way. My patch didn't contain any long lines!
Sure! Please try applying the patch yourself, before claiming the opposite.
Your changes didn't contain long
On Jul 19, 2008, at 1:01 PM, Markus Heidelberg wrote:
So let me know what you want to do here, as long as I'm revising my
patch. If you want to fix Vim so that the current :h text-objects
does not lie, then I will remove the option, fix startPS(), and
correct :h paragraph in my patch.
I
Hi,
I've been a Vim user for many years... this is my first post to this
dev list and my first contribution to Vim :-)
I love to use '{' and '}' to move between sections separated by blank
lines... and, accordingly I make sure that all my blank lines are
really *empty* (i.e., no
