Re: missing cpoptions settings in some syntax files

2011-10-14 Fir de Conversatie Thilo Six
Charles Campbell wrote the following on 14.10.2011 17:27 Hello Charles, -- -- > So, netrw may be > removed from your list; you might want to change your greps to > accomodate setlocal. Indeed 'autoload/netrw.vim' is cpo save. Thank you! > Regards, > Chip Campbell Regards, -- bye Thilo 40

Re: missing cpoptions settings in some syntax files

2011-10-14 Fir de Conversatie Charles Campbell
Danek Duvall wrote: Thilo Six wrote: attached is full list of affected files. Those files below /doc can be ignored i assume. I would like to see the rest fixed, too. Can we join forces? ...snip... I used comm -13 =(grep -l "set cpo" **/*.vim) =(grep -l "^[[:space:]]*" **/*.vim)

Re: missing cpoptions settings in some syntax files

2011-10-13 Fir de Conversatie Thilo Six
Danek Duvall wrote the following on 12.10.2011 23:40 -- -- > I used > > comm -13 =(grep -l "set cpo" **/*.vim) =(grep -l "^[[:space:]]*" > **/*.vim) > > to generate mine (with some zsh-isms). That gives 73 files to check out > once you ignore the keymap files. -- -- funily my upd

Re: missing cpoptions settings in some syntax files

2011-10-13 Fir de Conversatie Thilo Six
Danek Duvall wrote the following on 12.10.2011 23:40 Hello Danek, -- -- > If you want, we can split them up, but the trick will be to weed out > maintainers that already got the message by way of the syntax file missive > I sent out and to make sure we don't duplicate each other. I think it's

Re: missing cpoptions settings in some syntax files

2011-10-12 Fir de Conversatie Danek Duvall
Thilo Six wrote: > attached is full list of affected files. Those files below /doc can be > ignored i > assume. I would like to see the rest fixed, too. Can we join forces? Well, I sent out a missive to the maintainers of the syntax files (some of whom also own some of the other runtime files),

Re: missing cpoptions settings in some syntax files

2011-10-12 Fir de Conversatie Thilo Six
Danek Duvall wrote the following on 11.10.2011 22:13 Hello Danek Thanks for your affort. > There are a handful of syntax files that use backslash continuation > characters without ensuring that cpoptions is missing C, so when running > vim in vi compatibility mode (such as when there's no .vimrc

Re: missing cpoptions settings in some syntax files

2011-10-12 Fir de Conversatie Thilo Six
Thilo Six wrote the following on 12.10.2011 20:25 -- -- > attached is full list of affected files. ... PS. I know the search pattern I used produces false positives. So i rephrase the above to 'files need to be checked'. -- bye Thilo 4096R/0xC70B1A8F 721B 1BA0 095C 1ABA 3FC6 7C18 89A4 A2A0

Re: missing cpoptions settings in some syntax files

2011-10-12 Fir de Conversatie Bram Moolenaar
Danek Duvall wrote: > There are a handful of syntax files that use backslash continuation > characters without ensuring that cpoptions is missing C, so when running > vim in vi compatibility mode (such as when there's no .vimrc), you'll get > errors like > > Error detected while processing /