Syntax broken with 1137

2013-06-10 Fir de Conversatie Axel Bender
I noticed, that with 1137 (or lower?) my (own) vim.vim syntax file (maybe others too) is broken (right now I'm at 1156). Starting with re=0 or re=2 some items don't get highlighted any more, with re=1 everything's fine. -- -- You received this message from the vim_dev maillist. Do not

Re: Syntax broken with 1137

2013-06-10 Fir de Conversatie Bram Moolenaar
Axel Bender wrote: I noticed, that with 1137 (or lower?) my (own) vim.vim syntax file (maybe others too) is broken (right now I'm at 1156). Starting with re=0 or re=2 some items don't get highlighted any more, with re=1 everything's fine. 1137 is already old :-). Please sync to head.

Re: Syntax broken with 1137

2013-06-10 Fir de Conversatie Axel Bender
Hi Bram, the break is still evident in 1156; however, I was able to track the issue back to 1138 (backup version). Are you saying that this vim file is not highlighted properly? No, using my own vim.vim (the one I submitted) with re=1 as both, the syntax file and the source file, the

Re: Syntax broken with 1137

2013-06-10 Fir de Conversatie Bram Moolenaar
Axel Bender wrote: the break is still evident in 1156; however, I was able to track the issue back to 1138 (backup version). Are you saying that this vim file is not highlighted properly? No, using my own vim.vim (the one I submitted) with re=1 as both, the syntax file and the source

Re: Syntax broken with 1137

2013-06-10 Fir de Conversatie Axel Bender
Ok with 1157. Thanks, Bram! -- -- You received this message from the vim_dev maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups