Mark Waggoner wrote:
> Here's a test:
Thanks! Always nice when someone fixes the problem they reported
themselves :-).
--
"The future's already arrived - it's just not evenly distributed yet."
-- William Gibson
/// Bram Moolenaar -- b...@moolenaar.net --
Here's a test:
diff --git i/src/testdir/test_winbuf_close.vim
w/src/testdir/test_winbuf_close.vim
index 7f5b80e8d..f32735e45 100644
--- i/src/testdir/test_winbuf_close.vim
+++ w/src/testdir/test_winbuf_close.vim
@@ -194,3 +194,23 @@ func Test_tabwin_close()
call assert_true(v:true)
%bwipe!
This seems to work better:
diff --git i/src/window.c w/src/window.c
index 7efe7b164..e28955d1b 100644
--- i/src/window.c
+++ w/src/window.c
@@ -2967,10 +2967,18 @@ win_altframe(
if (frp->fr_next == NULL)
return frp->fr_prev;
+// By default the next window will get the space
If you have splitright and noequalalways set, when you split a window
(normal horizontal split, not vertical split), the split will appear above
the current window.
When you close the split window, the space is restored to the window ABOVE,
not back to the window below.
I can see that this is
