mattn wrote the following on 24.01.2012 02:49
-- snip --
I do relicense for followings files under the terms of the Vim license.
runtime/tutor/tutor.ja.euc (converted from utf-8)
runtime/tutor/tutor.ja.sjis (converted from utf-8)
runtime/tutor/tutor.ja.utf-8
runtime/colors/shine.vim
If
Yasuhiro Matsumoto wrote:
15/01/12 @ 21:32 (+0100), Thilo Six escriu:
Dear Vim Script Maintainer,
it has been revealed that there are files in the vim runtime distribution
that
are *not* licensed under the terms of the vim license.
For details what the vim license is, please take a
Thilo, I don't think we need to ask maintainers of files that currently
do not have a copyright or license notice. It defaults to the Vim
license because it's part of the package.
I wasn't asked from him. I thought that he is asking to all contribute
authors.
Thanks.
--
You received
15/01/12 @ 21:32 (+0100), Thilo Six escriu:
Dear Vim Script Maintainer,
it has been revealed that there are files in the vim runtime distribution
that
are *not* licensed under the terms of the vim license.
For details what the vim license is, please take a look at: ':help
copyright' or
Ernest Adrogué wrote:
Hello,
15/01/12 @ 21:32 (+0100), Thilo Six escriu:
Dear Vim Script Maintainer,
it has been revealed that there are files in the vim runtime distribution
that
are *not* licensed under the terms of the vim license.
For details what the vim license is, please
James Hunt wrote:
On 15/01/12 20:51, Michael Biebl wrote:
On 15.01.2012 21:48, Thilo Six wrote:
Michael Biebl wrote the following on 15.01.2012 21:40
Hello Michael,
Thank you for prompt email.
-- snip --
I writing to you, because you are mentioned as maintainer of one of
