Re: Usage of libiconv-2.dll (64-bit) results in false detection of file encoding

No ideas? -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev"

Re: [vim/vim] and can't be recognized in vimrc (#1239)

Hi Ziming, 2016-11-8(Tue) 15:46:44 UTC+9 Ziming Dong: > @vim-ml > > Messages maintainer: Bram Moolenaar > compatible: 0 > cpoptions: aAbBcCdDeEfFgHiIjJkKlLmMnoOpPqrRsStuvwWxXyZ$!%*-+<>; If `<` is included in `cpoptions` option, You can see the behavior you reported. Have you

Re: [vim/vim] and can't be recognized in vimrc (#1239)

Hi Ziming, 2016-11-8(Tue) 13:36:28 UTC+9 Ziming Dong: > I'm using vim8.0, version 8.0.23. > > this is my vimrc file in ~/.vimrc. > > I find these lines not working, > :map :tabp > :map :tabn > inoremap { {} > inoremap ( () > inoremap [ [] > > > and when I type {, I just get {} in insert

Patch 8.0.0071

Patch 8.0.0071 Problem:Exit value from a shell command is wrong. (Hexchain Tong) Solution: Do not check for ended jobs while waiting for a shell command. (ichizok, closes #1196) Files: src/os_unix.c *** ../vim-8.0.0070/src/os_unix.c 2016-11-04 20:35:27.352945991

Patch 8.0.0070

Patch 8.0.0070 Problem:Tests referred in Makefile that no longer exist. Solution: Remove test71 and test74 entries. (Michael Soyka) Files: src/testdir/Make_ming.mak *** ../vim-8.0.0069/src/testdir/Make_ming.mak 2016-08-06 20:34:08.0 +0200 --- src/testdir/Make_ming.mak

Re: Remove references to obsolete tests in testdir/Make_ming.mak

Michael Soyka wrote: > Build test numbers 71 and 74 have been deleted from the git repository > but are still referenced in the ming makefile. The following diff > illustrates the proposed change: > > diff --git a/src/testdir/Make_ming.mak b/src/testdir/Make_ming.mak > index 3330691..ab6a60b

Re: [vim/vim] Strange value of v:shell_error when calling system() with silent (#1196)

Hi Kiichi, Perhaps you should enclose all of the added lines in the below directive? #if defined(FEAT_JOB_CHANNEL) && !defined(USE_SYSTEM) ... #endif ? (use `#if defined(FEAT_JOB_CHANNEL) && !defined(USE_SYSTEM)` instead of `# ifdef FEAT_JOB_CHANNEL`) -- Best regards, Hirohito Higashi