2017-03-23 11:34 GMT+03:00 Dominique Pellé :
> @jamessan wrote:
>
> You could use something like gperf or triehash to generate the hash table at
> build time.
> gperf is widely available, but triehash is a simple Perl script with a
> permissive license,
> so it could
I wrote:
> Hirohito Higashi wrote:
>
> > > > > > My config:
> > > > > > $ ./configure --with-features=huge --enable-gui=gnome2
> > > > > > --enable-fail-if-missing
> > > > > > My env.:
> > > > > > I am connecting to fedora 25 with ssh via PuTTY on Windows 7.
> > > > > > Vim version:
> > >
Keny Hu wrote:
> I have talked to James Kidd who maintains the SAS syntax script. He kindly
> agreed to have me assume the maintenance task for him. Please let me know
> if this is okay with you.
Very good, thanks for taking over.
--
% cat /usr/include/sys/errno.h
#define EPERM 1
Hirohito Higashi wrote:
> > > > > My config:
> > > > > $ ./configure --with-features=huge --enable-gui=gnome2
> > > > > --enable-fail-if-missing
> > > > > My env.:
> > > > > I am connecting to fedora 25 with ssh via PuTTY on Windows 7.
> > > > > Vim version:
> > > > > 8.0.502
> > > > >
>
Patch 8.0.0503
Problem:Endless loop in updating folds with 32 bit ints.
Solution: Subtract from LHS instead of add to the RHS. (Matthew Malcomson)
Files: src/fold.c
*** ../vim-8.0.0502/src/fold.c 2017-03-16 22:06:51.824726916 +0100
--- src/fold.c 2017-03-23 21:19:13.084212797 +0100
Matthew Malcomson wrote:
> The recent patch for :move with folds calls `foldRemove()` with
> `MAXLNUM` for the bottom of the range to remove.
> This seems like a logical way to say "Remove all folds below here".
> For 32 bits, `foldRemove()` can't handle `bot` being `MAXLNUM`, and goes
> into
Hi Bram,
I have talked to James Kidd who maintains the SAS syntax script. He kindly
agreed to have me assume the maintenance task for him. Please let me know
if this is okay with you.
Best,
Zhen-Huan
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 4:29 PM, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
>
> Zhen-Huan Hu
2017-03-23 22:41 GMT+09:00 Elimar Riesebieter :
> * Kazunobu Kuriyama [2017-03-23 21:58
> +0900]:
>
> > 2017-03-23 21:22 GMT+09:00 h_east :
> [...]
> > > > So, the result of test_clientserver looks as if the patch were not
> >
* Kazunobu Kuriyama [2017-03-23 21:58 +0900]:
> 2017-03-23 21:22 GMT+09:00 h_east :
[...]
> > > So, the result of test_clientserver looks as if the patch were not
> > >included. I'm wondering if the test was done with the patched
> >
2017-03-23 21:22 GMT+09:00 h_east :
> Hi Kazunobu and all,
>
> 2017-3-23(Thu) 21:01:32 UTC+9 Kazunobu Kuriyama:
> > 2017-03-23 18:13 GMT+09:00 Elimar Riesebieter :
> >
> >
> > * Bram Moolenaar [2017-03-22 22:30 +0100]:
> >
> >
> >
> >
Hi Kazunobu and all,
2017-3-23(Thu) 21:01:32 UTC+9 Kazunobu Kuriyama:
> 2017-03-23 18:13 GMT+09:00 Elimar Riesebieter :
>
>
> * Bram Moolenaar [2017-03-22 22:30 +0100]:
>
>
>
>
>
> >
>
> > Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
>
> >
>
> > > > Hirohito Higashi
2017-03-23 18:13 GMT+09:00 Elimar Riesebieter :
> * Bram Moolenaar [2017-03-22 22:30 +0100]:
>
> >
> > Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> >
> > > > Hirohito Higashi wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > My config:
> > > > > $ ./configure --with-features=huge
Hello there,
The recent patch for :move with folds calls `foldRemove()` with
`MAXLNUM` for the bottom of the range to remove.
This seems like a logical way to say "Remove all folds below here".
For 32 bits, `foldRemove()` can't handle `bot` being `MAXLNUM`, and goes
into an endless loop of
Christian Brabandt wrote:
> On Mi, 22 Mär 2017, Marco Ippolito wrote:
>
>> Should editing .gitignore swap to ..gitignore.swp rather than .gitignore.swp?
>
> Why would you think so?
:help swapname says:
==
:sw[apname]*:sw* *:swapname*
The name of the swap file is
* Bram Moolenaar [2017-03-22 22:30 +0100]:
>
> Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
>
> > > Hirohito Higashi wrote:
> > >
> > > > My config:
> > > > $ ./configure --with-features=huge --enable-gui=gnome2
> > > > --enable-fail-if-missing
> > > > My env.:
> > > > I am connecting
Hi Bram,
2017-3-23(Thu) 6:31:02 UTC+9 Bram Moolenaar:
> Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
>
> > > Hirohito Higashi wrote:
> > >
> > > > My config:
> > > > $ ./configure --with-features=huge --enable-gui=gnome2
> > > > --enable-fail-if-missing
> > > > My env.:
> > > > I am connecting to fedora 25
On Mi, 22 Mär 2017, Marco Ippolito wrote:
> Should editing .gitignore swap to ..gitignore.swp rather than .gitignore.swp?
Why would you think so?
Best,
Christian
--
Letzte Worte eines Software-Entwicklers:
"Natürlich habe ich ein intaktes Backup."
--
--
You received this message from the
Should editing .gitignore swap to ..gitignore.swp rather than .gitignore.swp?
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this
18 matches
Mail list logo