PRs for the Vim 9.1 release milestone

2023-08-14 Fir de Conversatie Yegappan Lakshmanan
Hi all, Most of the outstanding PRs are now either assigned to the vim-9.1 milestone or to the backlog: https://github.com/vim/vim/milestone/1 https://github.com/vim/vim/milestone/2 If you think a PR should be or should not be part of these milestones, let us know. The criteria for the vim-9.1

CI Linux tests are failing

2023-08-14 Fir de Conversatie Yegappan Lakshmanan
Hi, The CI Linux tests are failing for the past few days due to missing linux-modules-extra-5.15.0-1042-azure package. Should we disable the sound tests temporarily and disable the installation of this package? Regards, Yegappan -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do

Re: Surprising test failure after rebasing PR

2023-08-14 Fir de Conversatie Yegappan Lakshmanan
Hi, On Mon, Aug 14, 2023 at 6:39 PM Ernie Rael wrote: > > Bunch of failures, all of them > > Set up snd-dummy > E: Package 'linux-modules-extra-5.15.0-1042-azure' has no installation > candidate > > I see this after rebasing and pushing two PR's. > > Is there something I need to do? > No. We

Surprising test failure after rebasing PR

2023-08-14 Fir de Conversatie Ernie Rael
Bunch of failures, all of them Set up snd-dummy E: Package 'linux-modules-extra-5.15.0-1042-azure' has no installation candidate I see this after rebasing and pushing two PR's. Is there something I need to do? -ernie -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do

Re: No more tags for new 9.0 patches?

2023-08-14 Fir de Conversatie Enan Ajmain
On Mon, 14 Aug 2023 12:18:50 +0200 Christian Brabandt wrote: > On Mo, 14 Aug 2023, Manfred Rosenboom wrote: > > Don't get each patch a related annotated tag anymore? > > I think we only used lightweight tags? So I only added those: Not that it's super important, but I suggest strictly using

Re: Farewell to Bram and dedicate upcoming Vim 9.1 to him (#12749)

2023-08-14 Fir de Conversatie Adri Verhoef
> Op 13-08-2023 10:45 CEST schreef Christian Brabandt : [..] > diff --git a/runtime/doc/intro.txt b/runtime/doc/intro.txt [..] > @@ -216,7 +217,7 @@ Vim would never have become what it is now, without the > help of these people! > Bill Foster Athena GUI port (later removed) >

Re: No more tags for new 9.0 patches?

2023-08-14 Fir de Conversatie Christian Brabandt
On Mo, 14 Aug 2023, Manfred Rosenboom wrote: > Up to patch 9.0.1677 I see a related annotated tag. But meanwhile I see the > following new patches in the commit log: > > * 5b0889b8b patch 9.0.1712: missing null check in object_clear() > * d3515a1e8 patch 9.0.1711: dead code in charset.c > *

No more tags for new 9.0 patches?

2023-08-14 Fir de Conversatie Manfred Rosenboom
Up to patch 9.0.1677 I see a related annotated tag. But meanwhile I see the following new patches in the commit log: * 5b0889b8b patch 9.0.1712: missing null check in object_clear() * d3515a1e8 patch 9.0.1711: dead code in charset.c * 4a8eb6e7a patch 9.0.1710: scrolloff options work slightly

Re: Documentation error

2023-08-14 Fir de Conversatie Adri Verhoef
I found this older message; the issue hasn't been resolved because the text has been moved from eval.txt to the file channel.txt (as part of the package vim-common-9.0.1677-2.fc38.x86_64). See issue below. > Op 17-05-2018 20:08 CEST schreef Bram Moolenaar : > > > Adri Verhoef wrote: > > >