Ben Fritz wrote:
On Tuesday, May 21, 2013 3:01:05 PM UTC-5, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Skeept wrote:
Also for the next release, if possible would it be possible to
distribute a 64 bit for windows as well a 32 bit?
It's not all that useful. It uses more memory, is probably a bit
2. 64-bit WinPE does not have a WOW64 subsystem, hence you cannot run
a 32-bit executable.
What is WinPE?
Windows Preinstallation Environment
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_Preinstallation_Environment
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh825110.aspx
Basically, a live CD.
kl. 23:40:01 UTC+2 tirsdag 21. mai 2013 skrev skeept følgende:
Well, I have downloaded the 64 bit 2.0-p195 rubyinstaller from
http://rubyinstaller.org/downloads/
and configured ruby with
RUBY=C:\htemp\Ruby200-x64 DYNAMIC_RUBY=yes RUBY_VER=20 RUBY_VER_LONG=2.0.0 ^
when compiling I get the
On Wednesday, May 22, 2013 5:05:23 AM UTC-5, Andrei Olsen wrote:
kl. 23:40:01 UTC+2 tirsdag 21. mai 2013 skrev skeept følgende:
Well, I have downloaded the 64 bit 2.0-p195 rubyinstaller from
http://rubyinstaller.org/downloads/
and configured ruby with
RUBY=C:\htemp\Ruby200-x64
For me compiling ruby with visual studio was the way to go since I have tried
to build with mingw and python and for some reason it did not link correctly
(the 32 bit version works fine).
Oh, I forgot that I had a slightly modified make file. It will work if you add
-DMS_WIN64
to DEFINES
Thanks. I hope a few people can try it out.
Was this patch applied already?
I tried compiling a 64 bit windows but if failed complaining that some include
file could not be found.
If possible could this patch be included for the next release?
A small example on how to use rubydo
Skeept wrote:
Thanks. I hope a few people can try it out.
Was this patch applied already?
I tried compiling a 64 bit windows but if failed complaining that some
include file could not be found.
If possible could this patch be included for the next release?
AFAIK this was included
On Tuesday, May 21, 2013 3:01:05 PM UTC-5, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Skeept wrote:
Thanks. I hope a few people can try it out.
Was this patch applied already?
I tried compiling a 64 bit windows but if failed complaining that some
include file could not be found.
Was this patch applied already?
I tried compiling a 64 bit windows but if failed complaining that some
include file could not be found.
If possible could this patch be included for the next release?
AFAIK this was included in patch 7.3.889.
Well, I have
On Tuesday, March 26, 2013 8:30:48 PM UTC+9, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
eagletmt wrote:
I found that Vim cannot be compiled with --enable-rubyinterp=dynamic
on 64bit platform if the Ruby's version is 2.0.0. I attached a patch
to fix it. Please check it.
Thanks. I hope a few
Hi list,
I found that Vim cannot be compiled with --enable-rubyinterp=dynamic on 64bit
platform if the Ruby's version is 2.0.0.
I attached a patch to fix it. Please check it.
--
--
You received this message from the vim_dev maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are
eagletmt wrote:
I found that Vim cannot be compiled with --enable-rubyinterp=dynamic
on 64bit platform if the Ruby's version is 2.0.0. I attached a patch
to fix it. Please check it.
Thanks. I hope a few people can try it out.
Please give us your name. I do not include code from anonymous
12 matches
Mail list logo
