Re: Patch 8.0.0148

2017-01-07 Fir de Conversatie Bram Moolenaar
Hirohito Higashi wrote: > Ah, There is no problem because the function body is in front of the > use point, right? Correct. We changed K function headers to ANSI style, but we haven't removed superfluous declarations. Will do that once in a while. -- hundred-and-one symptoms of being an

Re: Patch 8.0.0148

2017-01-07 Fir de Conversatie h_east
Hi Bram, Ah, There is no problem because the function body is in front of the use point, right? -- Best regards, Hirohito Higashi (a.k.a. h_east) -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more

Re: Patch 8.0.0148

2017-01-07 Fir de Conversatie h_east
Hi Bram, 2017-1-7(Sat) 23:40:11 UTC+9 Bram Moolenaar: > Patch 8.0.0148 > Problem:When a C preprocessor statement has two line continuations the > following line does not have the right indent. (Ken Takata) > Solution: Add the indent of the previous continuation lin

Patch 8.0.0148

2017-01-07 Fir de Conversatie Bram Moolenaar
Patch 8.0.0148 Problem:When a C preprocessor statement has two line continuations the following line does not have the right indent. (Ken Takata) Solution: Add the indent of the previous continuation line. (Hirohito Higashi) Files: src/misc1.c, src/testdir/test3