Hirohito Higashi wrote:
> Ah, There is no problem because the function body is in front of the
> use point, right?
Correct. We changed K function headers to ANSI style, but we haven't
removed superfluous declarations. Will do that once in a while.
--
hundred-and-one symptoms of being an
Hi Bram,
Ah, There is no problem because the function body is in front of the use point,
right?
--
Best regards,
Hirohito Higashi (a.k.a. h_east)
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more
Hi Bram,
2017-1-7(Sat) 23:40:11 UTC+9 Bram Moolenaar:
> Patch 8.0.0148
> Problem:When a C preprocessor statement has two line continuations the
> following line does not have the right indent. (Ken Takata)
> Solution: Add the indent of the previous continuation lin
Patch 8.0.0148
Problem:When a C preprocessor statement has two line continuations the
following line does not have the right indent. (Ken Takata)
Solution: Add the indent of the previous continuation line. (Hirohito
Higashi)
Files: src/misc1.c, src/testdir/test3