I found this older message; the issue hasn't been resolved because the text has
been moved from eval.txt to the file channel.txt (as part of the package
vim-common-9.0.1677-2.fc38.x86_64). See issue below.
> Op 17-05-2018 20:08 CEST schreef Bram Moolenaar :
>
>
> Adri Verhoef wrote:
>
> >
Adri Verhoef wrote:
> In eval.txt (vim 8.0.1842), line 5423, job_start() is documented. On
> the 13th
> line underneath it there is this text:
>
> On MS-Windows, job_start() makes a GUI application
> hidden. If
> want to show it, Use :!start instead.
>
>
In eval.txt (vim 8.0.1842), line 5423, job_start() is documented. On
the 13th
line underneath it there is this text:
On MS-Windows, job_start() makes a GUI application
hidden. If
want to show it, Use :!start instead.
Perhaps it should be "If you want" and
Tony Mechelynck wrote:
> The example given at line 4401 of eval.txt is incorrect: the statement
>
> :echo jsencode([1, v:none, {"one":1}], v:none)
>
> gives error E118: Too many arguments for function: jsencode
> followed by E15: Invalid expression
>
> The closing square bracket for the
t patch
# User Tony Mechelynck <antoine.mechely...@gmail.com>
# Parent 791f4657b5fcc7c1934d87e6bef1477fdc1ed0fa
documentation error about jsencode()
diff --git a/runtime/doc/eval.txt b/runtime/doc/eval.txt
--- a/runtime/doc/eval.txt
+++ b/runtime/doc/eval.txt
@@ -
shiftwidth() *shiftwidth()*
Returns the effective value of 'shiftwidth'. This is the
'shiftwidth' value unless it is zero, in which case it is the
'tabstop' value. To be backwards compatible in indent
plugins, use this:
if exists('*shiftwidth')
func s:sw()
return shiftwidth()
endfunc
Hi Benjamin!
On Do, 09 Okt 2014, Benjamin Fritz wrote:
shiftwidth() *shiftwidth()*
Returns the effective value of 'shiftwidth'. This is the
'shiftwidth' value unless it is zero, in which case it is the
'tabstop' value. To be backwards compatible in indent
plugins, use this:
if
Tony Mechelynck wrote:
I found a documentation error in Vim72a, see attachment. (I think it
also applies to Vim 7.1, but there it's not as important since
floating-point is not part of the standard sources.)
Actually, that isn't right either. It should read:
When
I found a documentation error in Vim72a, see attachment. (I think it
also applies to Vim 7.1, but there it's not as important since
floating-point is not part of the standard sources.)
Best regards,
Tony.
--
People think love is an emotion. Love is good sense.
-- Ken Kesey
Ben Schmidt wrote:
:help :sort|/first number
The documentation reads
To sort on the first number in the line, no matter
what is in front of it:
:sort /.*\ze\d/
which is clearly wrong. As * is greedy,
:help :sort|/first number
The documentation reads
To sort on the first number in the line, no matter
what is in front of it:
:sort /.*\ze\d/
which is clearly wrong. As * is greedy, this actually sorts on the last
:help :sort|/first number
The documentation reads
To sort on the first number in the line, no matter
what is in front of it:
:sort /.*\ze\d/
which is clearly wrong. As * is greedy, this actually sorts on the last
12 matches
Mail list logo