Re: Vim Java Syntax Patch

2018-02-17 Fir de Conversatie Bram Moolenaar
David Barnett wrote: > On Friday, February 2, 2018 at 3:20:59 PM UTC-8, Sam Lijin wrote: > > Oops, missed this email. > > > > Bram: is there any chance you could also review the Java syntax patches? > > > > I'd volunteer to do it, but I've been busy with personal stuff lately and > > haven't

Re: Vim Java Syntax Patch

2018-02-16 Fir de Conversatie David Barnett
+Dan On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 2:26 PM David Barnett wrote: > On Friday, February 2, 2018 at 3:20:59 PM UTC-8, Sam Lijin wrote: > > Oops, missed this email. > > > > Bram: is there any chance you could also review the Java syntax patches? > > > > I'd volunteer to do it, but

Re: Vim Java Syntax Patch

2018-02-16 Fir de Conversatie David Barnett
On Friday, February 2, 2018 at 3:20:59 PM UTC-8, Sam Lijin wrote: > Oops, missed this email. > > Bram: is there any chance you could also review the Java syntax patches? > > I'd volunteer to do it, but I've been busy with personal stuff lately and > haven't been able to make guarantees about

Re: Vim Java Syntax Patch

2018-02-02 Fir de Conversatie 'Sam Lijin' via vim_dev
Oops, missed this email. Bram: is there any chance you could also review the Java syntax patches? I'd volunteer to do it, but I've been busy with personal stuff lately and haven't been able to make guarantees about responsiveness for open source stuff. -- -- You received this message from

Re: Vim Java Syntax Patch

2018-01-25 Fir de Conversatie Bram Moolenaar
Sam Lijin wrote: > Bump. I'd appreciate if someone could take a look at this. > > Sam > > > On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 11:44 AM Sam Lijin wrote: > > > Hi vim-dev, > > > > First-time contributor here! I've got two patches for what I believe to be > > two separate issues in

Re: Vim Java Syntax Patch

2018-01-24 Fir de Conversatie 'Sam Lijin' via vim_dev
Bump. I'd appreciate if someone could take a look at this. Sam On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 11:44 AM Sam Lijin wrote: > Hi vim-dev, > > First-time contributor here! I've got two patches for what I believe to be > two separate issues in Java syntax highlighting. > > I tried