Hi, list,
I'm using :hardcopy on windows, find that the conceal feature will
disappear when printing, how to configure vim to support it, or is it a
missing feature?
--
Regards,
Yue Wu
Key Laboratory of Modern Chinese Medicines
Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine
China Pharmaceutica
Hi Ben!
On So, 22 Mai 2011, Ben Fritz wrote:
> > You should fix your 'fencs' setting to something like
> > ucs-bom,utf-8,default,latin1
>
> The 'fileencodings' option is what Vim uses to detect file encoding
> when *reading* a file. When writing, Vim uses the current setting of
> 'fileencoding'
>Reply to message «Re: what are the differences among undofile, swap file, and
>session file?»,
>sent 04:00:13 23 May 2011, Monday
>by yanzhisheng:
>
>> but after you created a session file, quit Vim, and restart vim and
>> reload session file, you can undo the changes if necessary. so I think
>>
Reply to message «Re: what are the differences among undofile, swap file, and
session file?»,
sent 04:00:13 23 May 2011, Monday
by yanzhisheng:
> but after you created a session file, quit Vim, and restart vim and
> reload session file, you can undo the changes if necessary. so I think
> the fun
>On May 22, 7:46燼m, yanzhisheng wrote:
>> >> Can somebody can tell me what undofile differs from swap file? and
>> >> session file. I think session file is very strong! behaves like MATLAB
>> >> more or less! thanks.
>>
>> >I think the help explains it all. See
>>
>> >:h swap-file
>> >:h undo-pers
On May 22, 3:59 pm, Tim Chase wrote:
>
> My first questions would be:
>
> 1) what *is* in your vimrc?
>
> 2) what's the output of ":version"? This might also be checkable
> with ":echo 'xxx'>''" to see what it evals as. Depending your
> version, you might be running with -eval set. According to
On 05/22/2011 05:48 PM, hsitz wrote:
In this Vim installation the expression 'xxx'> '' evaluates to 0
(false) while in all other Vims I've seen the expression evaluates (as
it should) to 1 (true).
I confirm that it should eval to 1.
Is there some Vim setting (encoding?) that might have chang
I was debugging a problem with a plugin running in Vim73 on Arch Linux
and it seems to stem from an error in string expression evaluation.
In this Vim installation the expression 'xxx' > '' evaluates to 0
(false) while in all other Vims I've seen the expression evaluates (as
it should) to 1 (true)
On May 22, 6:00 am, Christian Brabandt wrote:
> Hi eNG1Ne!
>
> On So, 22 Mai 2011, eNG1Ne wrote:
>
> > Working on a Linux box (Ubuntu 10.4), I've successfully copy/pasted a
> > block of text from a Planmaker spreadsheet into a vim file. The text
> > includes U+2012 dashes, which are correctly di
On May 21, 8:22 pm, Antonio Recio wrote:
> Well I obtain all folded because there are
> {
> ...
>
> }
>
> But the question is how I can fold only the // comments including the empty
> lines and the /*...*/, but not the {}.
Use a :g command to close the folds. Starting with all folds open, do:
On May 22, 7:46 am, yanzhisheng wrote:
> >> Can somebody can tell me what undofile differs from swap file? and
> >> session file. I think session file is very strong! behaves like MATLAB
> >> more or less! thanks.
>
> >I think the help explains it all. See
>
> >:h swap-file
> >:h undo-persistenc
On May 22, 10:38 am, Ben Schmidt
wrote:
> On 22/05/11 12:44 PM, cyboman wrote:
>
>
>
> > the lint we are using outputs warnings and info messages. they are all
> > in the same format:
> > "file_path",line_number message_type message_type_number: message
>
> > where message_type is either warning
On 11/03/11 4:34 AM, Ben Godfrey wrote:
I'm working on a Vim compiler plugin for PHPUnit.
I've written the following errorformat. The error message is correctly
extracted, but file and line numbers are not.
CompilerSet errorformat=%E%n)\ %.%#,
\%C%m,
On 22/05/11 12:44 PM, cyboman wrote:
the lint we are using outputs warnings and info messages. they are all
in the same format:
"file_path",line_number message_type message_type_number: message
where message_type is either warning or info
however for some reason when a warning message is follow
>Hi yanzhisheng!
>
>On Sa, 21 Mai 2011, yanzhisheng wrote:
>
>> Can somebody can tell me what undofile differs from swap file? and
>> session file. I think session file is very strong! behaves like MATLAB
>> more or less! thanks.
>
>I think the help explains it all. See
>
>:h swap-file
>:h undo-per
Hi yanzhisheng!
On Sa, 21 Mai 2011, yanzhisheng wrote:
> Can somebody can tell me what undofile differs from swap file? and
> session file. I think session file is very strong! behaves like MATLAB
> more or less! thanks.
I think the help explains it all. See
:h swap-file
:h undo-persistence
:h
Hi Marcin!
On Sa, 21 Mai 2011, Marcin Szamotulski wrote:
> On 02:26 Sat 21 May , shawn wilson wrote:
> > On May 21, 2011 12:30 AM, "Antonio Recio" wrote:
> > >
> > > The two commands to delete the comments of C++ files are:
> > > :%s!\s*//.*\|/\*\_.\{-}\*/
> > > :g/^\s*$/d
> > >
> > > How I
Hi Antonio!
On Sa, 21 Mai 2011, Antonio Recio wrote:
> Well I obtain all folded because there are
> {
> ...
> }
>
> But the question is how I can fold only the // comments including the empty
> lines and the /*...*/, but not the {}.
Seems, there is no easy way available. So I'd suggest, copyin
Hi eNG1Ne!
On So, 22 Mai 2011, eNG1Ne wrote:
> Working on a Linux box (Ubuntu 10.4), I've successfully copy/pasted a
> block of text from a Planmaker spreadsheet into a vim file. The text
> includes U+2012 dashes, which are correctly displayed in vim … but
> when I try to save the vim file, I get
Working on a Linux box (Ubuntu 10.4), I've successfully copy/pasted a
block of text from a Planmaker spreadsheet into a vim file. The text
includes U+2012 dashes, which are correctly displayed in vim … but
when I try to save the vim file, I get the message "conversion error".
Probably related, but
Thilo Six wrote the following on 22.05.2011 12:11
-- --
sorry hit send to early.
>> Is line continuation acceptable?
>>
>> syn keyword ITK
>> \ a
>> \ b
>> \ c
>> \ d
>> \ e
>>
>> Ben.
>
> I have learned when one uses line continuation in there one has to make sure
> 'cpo' is set correct. That
Ben Schmidt wrote the following on 19.05.2011 20:26
> On 20/05/11 4:16 AM, AMDx64BT wrote:
>> I would like to edit the file syntax cpp.vim and include some new extensions
>> to
>> highlight. I would like to add these news extension as a vertical list, and
>> not in
>> the same line.
>>
>> The no
Hi, everyone,
Can somebody can tell me what undofile differs from swap file? and session
file. I think session file is very strong! behaves like MATLAB more or less!
thanks.
---yakex
--
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are
23 matches
Mail list logo
