On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 1:05 AM, Christian Brabandt cbli...@256bit.org wrote:
On Mon, June 11, 2012 22:33, Trey Sizemore wrote:
Notice how it doesn't preface the wrapped lines with so that the
e-mail response looks as it should. It *did* used to do this, but not
sure what might have changed
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 8:49 AM, Trey Sizemore hjsizem...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 1:05 AM, Christian Brabandt cbli...@256bit.org
wrote:
On Mon, June 11, 2012 22:33, Trey Sizemore wrote:
Notice how it doesn't preface the wrapped lines with so that the
e-mail response looks
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 10:45 AM, Trey Sizemore hjsizem...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 8:49 AM, Trey Sizemore hjsizem...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 1:05 AM, Christian Brabandt cbli...@256bit.org
wrote:
On Mon, June 11, 2012 22:33, Trey Sizemore wrote:
Notice how it
OK, I had recently added a line in my .vimrc (set paste) for pasting
external contents into vim while maintaining formatting. It worked
great, but was hosing up the aforementioned pieces as editor for mutt.
Commenting out that line returned expected behavior.
So for pasting things into vim
On Tuesday, June 12, 2012 9:56:24 AM UTC-5, Trey Sizemore wrote:
OK, I had recently added a line in my .vimrc (set paste) for pasting
external contents into vim while maintaining formatting. It worked
great, but was hosing up the aforementioned pieces as editor for mutt.
Commenting out
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Ben Fritz fritzophre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday, June 12, 2012 9:56:24 AM UTC-5, Trey Sizemore wrote:
OK, I had recently added a line in my .vimrc (set paste) for pasting
external contents into vim while maintaining formatting. It worked
great, but was
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Bee beeyaw...@gmail.com wrote:
OK, I had recently added a line in my .vimrc (set paste) for pasting
external contents into vim while maintaining formatting. It worked
great, but was hosing up the aforementioned pieces as editor for mutt.
Commenting out that
Hi,
I am working with someones elses file, some of them are readonly so I cannot
really just read read of the annyoying ^M in the end of the line.
Some lines have this charather others don't.
Even if I do
set ff=dos they are still changing.
I was thinking that it should be possible to hide
On 12.06.12,08:38, skeept wrote:
Hi,
I am working with someones elses file, some of them are readonly so I cannot
really just read read of the annyoying ^M in the end of the line.
Some lines have this charather others don't.
Even if I do
set ff=dos they are still changing.
I was
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 08:38:34AM -0700, skeept wrote:
I am working with someones elses file, some of them are readonly so I cannot
really just read read
+of the annyoying ^M in the end of the line.
On Tuesday, June 12, 2012 10:38:34 AM UTC-5, skeept wrote:
Hi,
I am working with someones elses file, some of them are readonly so I cannot
really just read read of the annyoying ^M in the end of the line.
Some lines have this charather others don't.
Even if I do
set ff=dos they are
On Tuesday, June 12, 2012 12:22:44 PM UTC-5, Ben Fritz wrote:
On Tuesday, June 12, 2012 10:38:34 AM UTC-5, skeept wrote:
Hi,
I am working with someones elses file, some of them are readonly so I
cannot really just read read of the annyoying ^M in the end of the line.
Some lines have
On 12/06/12 20:01, skeept wrote:
[...]
Thanks, the suggestion in the link
:e ++ff=dos
seems to do the trick. It does not overwrite the file and the ctrl-m are gone.
I don't understand well what it does, but it does the job,
Thank you again.
:e ++ff=dos reads the file, accepting either CR+LF
Hi ping!
On Di, 12 Jun 2012, ping wrote:
today I look at the csv plugin again, and I got the issue right
after I log a csv file:
//say this is my file content:
,,,
NH Walk for MAC validation for Customer's with dhcp binded but not
pingable,,,
,,,
Commands,Where to Execute,Expected
Don't know how it happened. I'd shut it down after making some changes to the
.vimrc settings of a critical plugin---vim-addon-manager. When I went to
restart it I was told it was in the trash.
So, I found it in the trash and drug it to the applications folder. Perhaps
there are other files
I'd like to yank some visually selected text with execute:
:execute 'normal! v05l+y'
But this indeed visually selected the 5 characters but
does not yank them. Its as if the is a comment
character and not the start of a yank-to operation.
I assume, like so much else with Vim, there is a way,
Hi ping!
On Di, 12 Jun 2012, ping wrote:
sorry about the confusion..not sure why you didn't get my screenshot
in my last email. and my file lines were all truncated (it does not
contain \r).
guess it was filtered by google-group.
here attached the file and hope you can get it this time.
oh I got it, making sense ,
I'll see how frequent I need this and learn more about how to fine tune
it per my need.
thanks!
On 06/12/2012 04:01 PM, Christian Brabandt wrote:
Hi ping!
On Di, 12 Jun 2012, ping wrote:
sorry about the confusion..not sure why you didn't get my screenshot
in my
On Tuesday, June 12, 2012 2:58:53 PM UTC-5, Richard wrote:
I'd like to yank some visually selected text with execute:
:execute 'normal! v05l+y'
But this indeed visually selected the 5 characters but
does not yank them. Its as if the is a comment
character and not the start of a yank-to
On 06/12/12 14:58, richard emberson wrote:
I'd like to yank some visually selected text with execute:
:execute 'normal! v05l+y'
But this indeed visually selected the 5 characters but
does not yank them. Its as if the is a comment
character and not the start of a yank-to operation.
While I
I get:
E354: Invalid register name: '+'
when I use it.
On 06/12/2012 02:02 PM, Tim Chase wrote:
:let @+ = getline('.')[:4]
--
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes
--
You received this message from the vim_use maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more
On 06/12/12 16:04, richard emberson wrote:
I get:
E354: Invalid register name: '+'
when I use it.
:let @+ = getline('.')[:4]
That sounds suspiciously like you're using a non-gui enabled build
of Vim which would point to why your normal version isn't working
either. If there's no
My Fedora version of vim 7.3 does not include clipboard
but does include xterm_clipboard.
On 06/12/2012 01:58 PM, Ben Fritz wrote:
:execute 'normal! v05l+y'
--
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes
--
You received this message from the vim_use maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the
When I enter:
:execute 'normal! v05lby'
Vim yanks to register b and the text is NOT highlighted, but with
:execute 'normal! v05l+y'
the text becomes highlighted and nothing is placed in +.
It really is as if the is treated as the start of a comment.
On 06/12/2012 01:58 PM, Ben Fritz wrote:
Ha,
Using gvim,
:execute 'normal! v05l+y'
works.
It must be something about Fedora's console Vim.
On 06/12/2012 01:58 PM, Ben Fritz wrote:
On Tuesday, June 12, 2012 2:58:53 PM UTC-5, Richard wrote:
I'd like to yank some visually selected text with execute:
:execute 'normal! v05l+y'
But this
On 06/12/12 16:32, richard emberson wrote:
When I enter:
:execute 'normal! v05lby'
Vim yanks to register b and the text is NOT highlighted, but with
:execute 'normal! v05l+y'
the text becomes highlighted and nothing is placed in +.
It really is as if the is treated as the start of a
On 13/06/12 00:30, ping wrote:
I happen to have a file displaying ^M, but looks this works only to hide
the ^M in the end of the line , not the beginning of it.
My file have both...see following screenshot:
after :e ++ff=dos the trailing ^M disappear, but the preceding one is
still there,
27 matches
Mail list logo
