go to to file (gf) without extention

hi guys, when using gf vim can open a file with the same name in the current directory. I use vim for verilog files editing in Verilog syntax one can see something line this (.); I want to be able to open the .v file in current directory when cursor is on the

Re: Diagnosing a Vim Crash

On 5 February 2016 at 17:23, Christian Brabandt wrote: > On Fr, 05 Feb 2016, Dominique Pellé wrote: > >> You're using vim-7.4.827. The latest vim is vim-7.4.1261 >> so you're missing quite a few patches. >> >> Since you wrote that you compiled vim yourself, could you >>

Re: Feature or bug? dw oddities

On 08.02.16 10:50, Matt Ackeret wrote: > The next text will be from the Russian input method: > АВСРОМИС > > This wasn't typed in Terminal, but I just typed Russian characters > into Terminal, and they showed up fine. Viewing Cyrillic, Greek, or Russian characters doesn't work for me in "xterm"

Re: go to to file (gf) without extention

On 2016-02-08 03:41, zismad wrote: > hi guys, > > when using gf vim can open a file with the same name in the current > directory. I use vim for verilog files editing in Verilog syntax > one can see something line this > > (.); > > I want to be able to open the .v file in current >

Re: Can you edit EBCDIC files on non-OS390 builds of VIM?

On Sunday, January 31, 2016 at 4:43:25 AM UTC-5, Justin Dearing wrote: > I'd like to edit EBCDIC encoded files in VIM on windows vim --version shows > this: I just read all the answers here. Apparently I was not subscribed to this post because the moderator didn't approve me, and I forgot all

Re: Can you edit EBCDIC files on non-OS390 builds of VIM?

On Sunday, January 31, 2016 at 6:14:49 PM UTC-5, Eric Christopherson wrote: > I find it interesting to see > this question, just a few days after reading a page laying out the case > for NeoVim . . . it > gave EBCDIC support as an example of something that no one would ever > use Vim for! Ok that

Re: Feature or bug? dw oddities

> On Feb 6, 2016, at 3:47 PM, Tony Mechelynck > wrote: > > http://users.skynet.be/antoine.mechelynck/other/keybbe.htm — but I > don't know how one would get those non-ASCII letters on a > (non-international) QWERTY keyboard meant for en-US. > Use a different

Re: Feature or bug? dw oddities

Christian Brabandt wrote: > Hi Bram! > > On Sa, 06 Feb 2016, Bram Moolenaar wrote: > > > There are a few more places in the docs that need to point to this flag. > > > > Is there a better character than "_" to use for this? > > Updated patch uses 'z' > > Also added some more references to

Re: Can you edit EBCDIC files on non-OS390 builds of VIM?

Justin Dearing wrote: > I'd like to edit EBCDIC encoded files in VIM on windows vim --version shows > this: > > VIM - Vi IMproved 7.4 (2013 Aug 10, compiled Sep 16 2015 08:44:57) > Included patches: 1-872 > Compiled by > Huge version without GUI. Features included (+) or not

Re: Can you edit EBCDIC files on non-OS390 builds of VIM?

On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 3:14 PM Nikolay Aleksandrovich Pavlov < zyx@gmail.com> wrote: > Also do you have an access to such mainframe and can you test whether > *Vim* compiles there with EBCDIC macros defined? I'm not a mainframe guy I'm dealing with the IBM i (formerly AS/400). That's a

Re: Feature or bug? dw oddities

Hi Bram! On Sa, 06 Feb 2016, Bram Moolenaar wrote: > There are a few more places in the docs that need to point to this flag. > > Is there a better character than "_" to use for this? Updated patch uses 'z' Also added some more references to it in the documentation. > Also, plugin writers

Re: Can you edit EBCDIC files on non-OS390 builds of VIM?

On 8 February 2016, Justin Dearing wrote: > On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 3:14 PM Nikolay Aleksandrovich Pavlov < > zyx@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Also do you have an access to such mainframe and can you test > > whether *Vim* compiles there with EBCDIC macros defined? > > > I'm

Re: Can you edit EBCDIC files on non-OS390 builds of VIM?

2016-02-08 21:35 GMT+03:00 Justin Dearing : > On Sunday, January 31, 2016 at 6:14:49 PM UTC-5, Eric Christopherson wrote: >> I find it interesting to see >> this question, just a few days after reading a page laying out the case >> for NeoVim . . . it >> gave EBCDIC support as