Hi,
I am reviving an old thread.
On Monday, April 13, 2015 at 5:04:20 AM UTC-7, herm...@free.fr wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I did not expect that many reactions. This is nice. Thank you all for
> your interest in the matter.
>
> > > Ah, but as long as you are OK with that information showing up in
> >
On May 24, Christian Brabandt wrote:
> [...]
>
> However, I think you might have found a bug here. Your
> ftdetect script does this:
I don't know that I'd characterise it as a bug, since this:
> autocmd BufNew,BufNewFile,BufRead *.md :set filetype=markdown
>
> The :args command does fill
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 11:08:58PM +, Antony Scriven wrote:
> On May 24, Frew Schmidt wrote:
>
> > [...]
> >
> > Maybe a dumb question, but why would BufNew be more expensive
> > than BufRead? Shouldn't the filetype stuff get run either way?
> > I wouldn't expect BufRead to take 500ms
On May 24, Frew Schmidt wrote:
> [...]
>
> Maybe a dumb question, but why would BufNew be more expensive
> than BufRead? Shouldn't the filetype stuff get run either way?
> I wouldn't expect BufRead to take 500ms and BufNew to take
> multiple seconds, would you?
The bufnew autocommands
I'm glad you were able to come up with a solution! So I guess `vim *` goes
through a different codepath than `:args *`? Note that this also affects the
quickfix, the location list, and the local args list. Initially I discovered
this issue with `:cexpr` and reproduced it with `:lexpr` and
On Mi, 24 Mai 2017, fREW Schmidt wrote:
> Yes. "If I replace the contents of /usr/share/vim/vim80/syntax/vb.vim with
> `let
> b:current_syntax = "vb"` everything is fast and, as I would hope, the support
> files are not loaded N times per buffer but instead exactly once."
Well, I see the
Hi,
Want to use vim airline or spacevim in gvim build for windows 10 but which
guifont or font to use to get all special characters of these plugins ?
Thank you !
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
Le mercredi 24 mai 2017 21:54:12 UTC+2, Christian Brabandt a écrit :
> On Mi, 24 Mai 2017, Antony Scriven wrote:
>
> > Your colorscheme or vimrc or both appears to be causing
> > syncolor.vim to go bananas. I'd take a look at the code
> > there to find out what's going on. filetype.vim and
Yes. "If I replace the contents of /usr/share/vim/vim80/syntax/vb.vim with
`let b:current_syntax = "vb"` everything is fast and, as I would hope, the
support files are not loaded N times per buffer but instead exactly once."
--
Sent from a telephone. Pardon my brevity.
On May 24, 2017 12:52 PM,
On Mi, 24 Mai 2017, Antony Scriven wrote:
> Your colorscheme or vimrc or both appears to be causing
> syncolor.vim to go bananas. I'd take a look at the code
> there to find out what's going on. filetype.vim and menu.vim
> are just big. You can disable loading menu.vim with `set
> guioptions+=M`
On Mi, 24 Mai 2017, fREW Schmidt wrote:
> It is sorta weird that the vb syntax, is somehow part of the problem,
> but whatever I understand that this was the wrong way to configure the
> editor.
Not sure I understand. Are you saying, that the vb syntax script is
responsible for the long
Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> Charles Campbell wrote:
>
>> Tony Mechelynck wrote:
>>> In Bitstream Vera Sans Mono 8 in gvim 8.0.600 for GTK3 (which I just
>>> made using "make reconfig" after an update of the python2, python3 and
>>> IIRC lua packages), U+20F0 is present in the buffer and gvim
>>>
BPJ wrote:
>
>
> Den 22 maj 2017 21:32 skrev "Charles E Campbell"
> >:
>
> Tony Mechelynck wrote:
> > In Bitstream Vera Sans Mono 8 in gvim 8.0.600 for GTK3 (which I just
> > made using "make reconfig" after an update of the
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 9:28 AM, Brett Stahlman wrote:
> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 2:08 AM, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
>>
>> Brett Stahlman wrote:
>>
>>> On Tuesday, May 23, 2017 at 8:25:33 AM UTC-5, Brett Stahlman wrote:
>>> > On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 4:35
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 2:08 AM, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
>
> Brett Stahlman wrote:
>
>> On Tuesday, May 23, 2017 at 8:25:33 AM UTC-5, Brett Stahlman wrote:
>> > On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 4:35 AM, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Brett Stahlman wrote:
>> > >
Aha! That's it Antony; thanks; that explains it and a lot more. Sorry
for inexplicably missing this myself.
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 08:17:46AM +0100, Antony Scriven wrote:
> Try taking out the BufNew autocmd. That'll get triggered for every
> file in the args list, whereas BufRead is only
It is sorta weird that the vb syntax, is somehow part of the problem,
but whatever I understand that this was the wrong way to configure the
editor.
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 08:17:46AM +0100, Antony Scriven wrote:
> Try taking out the BufNew autocmd. That'll get triggered for every
> file in the
Le mercredi 24 mai 2017 11:01:31 UTC+2, Dominique Pelle a écrit :
> Ni Va :
>
> > Le mardi 23 mai 2017 21:46:01 UTC+2, Ni Va a écrit :
> >> Le mardi 23 mai 2017 18:14:24 UTC+2, MarcWeber a écrit :
> >> > > Thank you
> >> > Sped up by using a plugin manager supporting lazy
> Ok I save 100ms using the plugin manager vim-plug but not enough for me.
> Is anyone can advise me or explain to me why some files are loaded twice and
> take twice or more times N msec:
> - vim80/menu.vim
> - vim80\filetype.vim
I never compared vimplug vs VAM, but I'd be interested in it.
Ni Va :
> Le mardi 23 mai 2017 21:46:01 UTC+2, Ni Va a écrit :
>> Le mardi 23 mai 2017 18:14:24 UTC+2, MarcWeber a écrit :
>> > > Thank you
>> > Sped up by using a plugin manager supporting lazy loading or as needed
>> > (vim-addon-manager/Neobundle maybe more).
>> >
>> >
Your colorscheme or vimrc or both appears to be causing
syncolor.vim to go bananas. I'd take a look at the code
there to find out what's going on. filetype.vim and menu.vim
are just big. You can disable loading menu.vim with `set
guioptions+=M` if you don't need it. --Antony
2017-05-24 9:39
Le mardi 23 mai 2017 21:46:01 UTC+2, Ni Va a écrit :
> Le mardi 23 mai 2017 18:14:24 UTC+2, MarcWeber a écrit :
> > > Thank you
> > Sped up by using a plugin manager supporting lazy loading or as needed
> > (vim-addon-manager/Neobundle maybe more).
> >
> > Typically sourcing twice is not a
P.S. If you want to detect name changes, there's BufFilePost. --Antony
On 24 May 2017 at 08:17, Antony Scriven wrote:
> Try taking out the BufNew autocmd. That'll get triggered for every
> file in the args list, whereas BufRead is only triggered for the first
> one that's
Try taking out the BufNew autocmd. That'll get triggered for every
file in the args list, whereas BufRead is only triggered for the first
one that's actually edited. FWIW 'BufNew' is not in the template
ftdetect file in the docs. --Antony
On 23 May 2017 at 22:28, Frew Schmidt
Brett Stahlman wrote:
> On Tuesday, May 23, 2017 at 8:25:33 AM UTC-5, Brett Stahlman wrote:
> > On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 4:35 AM, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> > >
> > > Brett Stahlman wrote:
> > >
> %--snip--%
> > >
> > > The best solution is probably to also add the raw rhs, with
25 matches
Mail list logo