Den 2015-10-19 kl. 18:52, skrev Paul:
> For a reason that I haven't been able to suss out, "fictious" not
> recognized as spelling error.
That's because it "is a word" (an expression which I find rather silly)
according to major dictionaries, although labeled
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 9:46 PM, BPJ <b...@melroch.se> wrote:
> Den 2015-10-19 kl. 18:52, skrev Paul:
>
>> For a reason that I haven't been able to suss out, "fictious" not
>> recognized as spelling error.
>
> That's because it "is a word" (an
On Monday, October 19, 2015 at 4:47:31 PM UTC-4, Paul wrote:
>I wrote:
>> Oddly enough, I'm now getting into a mode wherein *no* words are
>> flagged as spelling errors. Except for solitary "s". That is,
>> unless I turn off syntax highlighting using ":syntax off". But
>> then, all LaTeX
Oddly enough, I'm now getting into a mode wherein *no* words are flagged as
spelling errors. Except for solitary "s". That is, unless I turn off syntax
highlighting using ":syntax off". But then, all LaTeX commands, arguments,
tags, labels, and equations get flagged as error. I slightly
I wrote:
> Oddly enough, I'm now getting into a mode wherein *no* words are
> flagged as spelling errors. Except for solitary "s". That is,
> unless I turn off syntax highlighting using ":syntax off". But
> then, all LaTeX commands, arguments, tags, labels, and equations get
> flagged as error.
On Monday, October 19, 2015 at 3:29:53 PM UTC-4, Paul wrote:
> I don't have the above named directory. My gvim is the one from
> cygwin:
>
>VIM - Vi IMproved 7.4 (2013 Aug 10, compiled May 20 2015 22:20:54)
>Included patches: 1-729
>Compiled by
>Huge version with GTK2 GUI.
Tim Chase <v...@tim.thechases.com> writes:
> On 2015-10-19 09:52, Paul wrote:
>> For a reason that I haven't been able to suss out, "fictious" not
>> recognized as spelling error.
>
> Not sure what OS you're on or what system dictionary you're using,
>
On Monday, October 19, 2015 at 2:19:12 PM UTC-4, Random832 wrote:
>Tim Chase writes:
>> On 2015-10-19 09:52, Paul wrote:
>>> For a reason that I haven't been able to suss out, "fictious" not
>>> recognized as spelling error.
>>
>> Not sure what OS
On 2015-10-19 09:52, Paul wrote:
> For a reason that I haven't been able to suss out, "fictious" not
> recognized as spelling error.
Not sure what OS you're on or what system dictionary you're using,
but that word/spelling is present in my
/usr/share/dict/american-english-i
For a reason that I haven't been able to suss out, "fictious" not recognized as
spelling error. It doesn't exist in my en.utf-8.add, and I double-checked by
mkspell!'ing it. I know that I have the right spell file due to other changes
I made (and whose effect I see in the main
10 matches
Mail list logo
